Step-by-step explanation:
It came from nowhere. It makes no sense to add up the balance numbers. To illustrate, let's use a different example:
![\left[\begin{array}{cc}Spend&Balance\\100&400\\100&300\\100&200\\100&100\\100&0\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcc%7DSpend%26Balance%5C%5C100%26400%5C%5C100%26300%5C%5C100%26200%5C%5C100%26100%5C%5C100%260%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
Adding up the money you spent, and you get $500. Add up the balances, and you get $1000. But why would you add the balances? The 300 in the second line is included in the 400 in the first line. You can't add them together. You'd be counting the 300 twice.
It takes 10 weeks for them to be the same weight
Answer:
110 in. = 9 1/6 ft, or 9 ft 2 in
Step-by-step explanation:
Please try to do a better job of formatting your next question. Thanks.
110 in 1 ft
-------- * --------- = 9 1/6 ft or 9 ft 2 in
1 12 in
Answer: Great more than happy to help!
Exponents come 2nd in line for PEMDAS (order of operations).
Once you finish the parenthesis, you move on to the exponents.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
It can be convenient to compute the length of the hypotenuse of this triangle (AC). The Pythagorean theorem tells you ...
AC^2 = AB^2 + CB^2
AC^2 = 4^2 + 3^2 = 16 + 9 = 25
AC = √25 = 5
The altitude divides ∆ABC into similar triangles ∆AHB and ∆BHC. The scale factor for ∆AHB is ...
scale factor ∆ABC to ∆AHB = AB/AC = 4/5 = 0.8
And the scale factor to ∆BHC is ...
scale factor ∆ABC to ∆BHC = BC/AC = 3/5 = 0.6
Then the side AH is 0.8·AB = 0.8·4 = 3.2
And the side CH is 0.6·BC = 0.6·3 = 1.8
These two side lengths should add to the length AC = 5, and they do.
The remaining side BH can be found from either scale factor:
BH = AB·0.6 = BC·0.8 = 4·0.6 = 3·0.8 = 2.4
_____
The sides of interest are ...
AH = 3.2
CH = 1.8
BH = 2.4