Answer:
Natural resources
Explanation:
Im not quite sure what your asking but if im right I think they have the competitive advantage of natural resource which would be the cow poop/manure that theyre using to power there facilities and fuel milk tankers.
sorry if im wrong
Answer:
The advisory fees will be "$500, 6 months or more in advance of rendering services".
Explanation:
- Whenever a nation-registered investment manager recognizes $500 (and sometimes more) of advanced consulting fees, 6 months more than before anticipation of providing services, then perhaps the consultant is deemed to have obtained ownership of customer funds being defined by NASAA.
- (In comparison, it should also be noted that perhaps the Advisers (investment) Act of year 1940 established the cap at $1,200 among Federal Covered consultants, although that wasn't the law for govt-registered consultants).
This was displayed on the said source. It cited connections to different aspects that show the importance of purchasing as a social responsibility. The center is mainly the Buyer's Relationship Commitment where it directs to the cooperation between the Buyer and Supplier. This relationship develops to trust, which is important to the business. It also pointed to the relationship to have a trusted and performing supplier.
Source: <span>Purchasing’s Contribution to the Socially Responsible Management of the Supply Chain
https://www.instituteforsupplymanagement.org/files/sr/capsarticle_purchasingscontribution.pdf
</span>
Answer:
The company's debt to equity ratio is 1.32
Explanation:
Wilson Company has following
Total Debt = Current liabilities + long-term liabilities
Total Debt = 100 + 150 = $250
Total Capital = Contributed capital + Retained earnings + Accumulated other comprehensive income
Total Capital = 120 + 50 + 20 = 190
Debt to equity Ratio = Total Debt / Shareholders Equity
Debt to equity Ratio = 250 / 190
Debt to equity Ratio = 25 / 19
Debt to equity Ratio = 1.32
Answer:
a. incremental cash flows.
Explanation:
Incremental cash flows is a capital budgeting technique used to determine whether to accept or reject the project. Analysis that considers incremental cashflow evaluates the net benefits of accepting the project versus if it is not accepted. This includes incremental revenue or sales, incremental expenses, changes in net working capital. Erosion effects is part of incremental cashflow which happens when a part of regular sales declines due to acceptance of a project.