1/3 divided by 2 is 1/6. Just half 1/3.
<u>T</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>s</u><u>t</u><u>a</u><u>t</u><u>e</u><u>m</u><u>e</u><u>n</u><u>t</u><u>s</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>r</u><u>u</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>f</u><u>o</u><u>r</u><u> </u><u>t</u><u>h</u><u>e</u><u> </u><u>g</u><u>i</u><u>v</u><u>e</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>f</u><u>u</u><u>n</u><u>c</u><u>t</u><u>i</u><u>o</u><u>n</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u>r</u><u>e</u><u>:</u>
I tried them all and these two were correct, their solutions are as follows:
= f(x) = 1/2x + 3/2
= f(0) = 1/2 × 0 + 3/2
= f(0) = 0 + 3/2
= f(0) = 3/2
= f(x) = 1/2x + 3/2
= f(4) = 1/2 × 4 + 3/2
= f(4) = 2 + 3/2
= f(4) = 4+3/2
= f(4) = 7/2
So, that's how these two are correct.
Given:
quarterly deposits of 2,000
8 percent compounded quarterly ⇒ 2% per quarter
4 quarters in 15 years = 60 quarters
Future Value = (1 + r) x P [{(1+r)^n - 1} / r]
FV = (1 + 0.02) x 2,000 [{(1 + 0.02)⁶⁰ - 1} / 0.02]
FV = 232, 665.14 Choice B.
Answer:P(win|regular) = 0.84
P(win|prevent) = 0.70
Conclusion: You are more likely to win by playing regular defense.
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide the regular defense wins(42) but the total of regular defense (50) and you get 0.84.
Then divide the prevent defense wins(35) by the total of prevent defense(50) and you get 0.70.
Since the regular defense is more than the prevent defense, then you are more likely to win by playing the regular defense. (:
Pills abs poisoned by a girl with you a