Let's say you have an idea that you want to present in writing. For an argument to be valid, it must have supporting evidence. An argument would just be useless if it did not have any documents or laws that would be supporting its justification. To say for example, I wanted to argue that the law of conservation of energy is not true. If I don't show actual evidence of energy being created, then that would leave me with an unclear, and most possibly invalid argument.
Answer:
Step 3 is wrong.
Step-by-step explanation:
[$171 + $52.45 − $18.50] does not equal 241.95 instead it equals 204.95.
Step 3 should be 204.95 ⋅ 1 over 3.
Step 3 is wrong.
<span>x < -1 should be your final answer. Hope this helps you!</span>
Answer:
4/20
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
3/28
Step-by-step explanation:
Set them up like this:
and the 5's cancel each other out, leaving you with
Multiply straight across the top and straight across the bottom to get
When you reduce as much as possible before multiplying, the answer will automatically be in its reduced form.