The concrete operational<span> stage is the third Piaget's theory of cognitive development. This period spans the time of middle childhood and is characterized by the development of logical thought. While </span>kids<span> at this age become more logical about</span>concrete<span> and specific things, they still struggle with abstract ideas</span>
Answer:
Debriefing
Explanation:
Debriefing: The term debriefing is defined as the procedure that is being implemented on the participants involved in a psychological experiment or research after the experiment or the research has already been conducted.
The procedure of debriefing involves a semi-structured or structured interview between the participants involved in the research or experiment and the researcher and all the elements being used during the research are discussed with the participants.
In the question above, the statement signifies the debriefing process.
Answer:
social exclusion
Explanation:
Social exclusion: In sociology, the term "social exclusion" is described as a type of 'discrimination'. Social exclusion generally occurs or happens when an individual is being partially or wholly excluded or debarred from participating in any political, economic, and social life of the community from which he or she belongs on the basis of his or her belonging to a specific social group, class, or category.
In the question above, the given statement could be interpreted by sociologists as social exclusion.
Answer:
Life is an/multiple organism/s that demonstrate the characteristics of life. If an organism demonstrates these 7 characteristics, it is considered living. All living organisms have a life process, aka. a life.
Answer:
d. officers becoming personally involved with informants.
Explanation:
An informant is a person who gives his testimony in relation to a situation as a way to help in the investigation of something. These people cannot be considered a witness of a situation, because they are not formally obliged to speak the truth about the facts of the situation (the witness is obliged to speak the truth), and they can tell fanciful, uncooperative and incorrect information.
In this case, it is extremely unethical for the information that an informant provides to be overestimated, because that information may be false. moreover, an informant cannot be intimidated or coerced into contributing to a given situation, nor can he be deceived about its relevance in the investigation, through false praise. However, in terms of ethics and morals, nothing prevents officers from personally getting involved with informants.
