All categories

2 years ago

ASAP ASAP ASAP ASAP

Chemistry

1 answer:

IrinaVladis [17]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Molar mass of NaN3,

MM = 1*MM(Na) + 3*MM(N)

= 1*22.99 + 3*14.01

= 65.02 g/mol

mass of NaN3 = 1.3*10^2 g

mol of NaN3 = (mass)/(molar mass)

= 1.3*10^2/65.02

= 2.0 mol

Balanced chemical equation is:

2NaN3(s) ---> 2Na(s) + 3N2(g)

According to balanced equation

mol of N2 formed = (3/2)* moles of NaN3

= (3/2)*2.0

= 3.0 mol

Molar mass of N2 = 28.02 g/mol

mass of N2 = number of mol * molar mass

= 3.0*28.02

= 84.0 g

Now use:

density = mass / volume

0.916 g/L = 84.0 g / volume

volume = 91.7 g

Answer: 91.7 g

You might be interested in

Which tempature is warmer than the freezing point in water?

vfiekz [6]

Water freezes at 0°C, 32°F, and 273°K. The only temperature warmer than the freezing point is 1°C.

7 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Calculate the feed ratio of adipic acid and hexamethylene diamine that should be employed to obtain a polyamide of approximately

artcher [175]

Answer:

r= 0.9949 (For 15,000)

r=0.995 (For 19,000)

Explanation:

We know that

Molecular weight of hexamethylene diamine = 116.21 g/mol

Molecular weight of adipic acid = 146.14 g/mol

Molecular weight of water = 18.016 g/mol

As we know that when adipic acid and hexamethylene diamine react then nylon 6, 6 comes out as the final product and release 2 molecule of water.

$M_{repeat}=146.14+166.21-2\times 18.106\ g/mol$

$M_{repeat}=226.32\ g/mol$

Mo= 226.32/2 =113.16 g/mol

$M_n=X_nM_o$

Given that

Mn= 15,000 g/mol

15,000 = Xn x 113.16

Xn = 132.55

Now by using Carothers equation we know that

$X_n=\dfrac{1+r}{1+r-2rp}$

$132.55=\dfrac{1+r}{1+r-2\times 0.99r}$

By calculating we get

r= 0.9949

For 19,000

19,000 = Xn x 113.16

Xn = 167.99

By calculating in same process given above we get

r=0.995

3 0

3 years ago

Newton believed _______ _______ were encoded alchemic recipes.

Zinaida [17]

I would say "Greek myths"

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

V1..0

Mars2501 [29]

Are spotted cats cuter than solid-colored cats?

4 0

2 years ago

There are two binary compounds of mercury and oxygen. heating either of them results in the decomposition of the compound, with

grandymaker [24]

$\text{Hg} \text{O}$ and $\text{Hg}_{2} \text{O}$ .

Assuming complete decomposition of both samples,

$m(\text{Hg}) = m(\text{residure})$
$m(\text{O}) = m(\text{loss})$

First compound:

$m(\text{O}) = m(\text{loss}) = 0.6498 - 0.6018 = 0.048 \; g$
$m(\text{Hg}) = m(\text{residure}) = 0.6018 \; g$

$n = m/M$ ; $0.6498 \; g$ of the first compound would contain

$n(\text{O atoms}) = 0.048 \; g / 16 \; g \cdot mol^{-1}= 0.003 \; mol$
$n(\text{Hg atoms}) = 0.6018 \; g / 200.58 \; g \cdot mol^{-1}= 0.003 \; mol$

Oxygen and mercury atoms seemingly exist in the first compound at a $1:1$ ratio; thus the empirical formula for this compound would be $\text{Hg} \text{O}$ where the subscript "1" is omitted.

Similarly, for the second compound

$m(\text{O}) = m(\text{loss}) = 0.016 \; g$
$m(\text{Hg}) = m(\text{residure}) = 0.4172 - 0.016 = 0.4012 \; g$

$n = m/M$ ; $0.4172 \; g$ of the first compound would contain

$n(\text{O atoms}) = 0.016 \; g / 16 \; g \cdot mol^{-1}= 0.001 \; mol$
$n(\text{Hg atoms}) = 0.4012 \; g / 200.58 \; g \cdot mol^{-1}= 0.002 \; mol$

$n(\text{Hg}) : n(\text{O}) \approx 2:1$ and therefore the empirical formula

$\text{Hg}_{2} \text{O}$ .

8 0

3 years ago