1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prohojiy [21]
3 years ago
5

Which sentence explains why optical land telescopes are not able to take images as clear as those taken by the Hubble Space Tele

scope?
Hubble takes pictures of planets, stars, and galaxies. The mixture of gases that surround a planet is called its atmosphere. Earth’s atmosphere changes and blocks some of the light that comes from space. Hubble orbits high above Earth and its atmosphere. So, Hubble can see space more clearly than telescopes on Earth can. Hubble is not the kind of telescope that you look through with your eye. Hubble uses a digital camera to take pictures. Then, Hubble uses radio waves to send the pictures through the air back to Earth.
Physics
2 answers:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
8 0

Sorry I'm a good year or so late, but its "Earth’s atmosphere changes and blocks some of the light that comes from space." !

ad-work [718]3 years ago
7 0

he Hubble Space Telescope has beamed hundreds of thousands of images back to Earth over the past two decades. One might call it the most skilled paparazzo, snapping countless images of the stars.

<span>Thanks to these images, scientists have been able to determine the age of the universe and shed light on the existence of dark energy. These extraordinary advancements have been possible because the Hubble images surpass those taken by Earth-based telescopes.</span>

<span>While ground-based observatories are usually located in highly elevated areas with minimal light pollution, they must contend with atmospheric turbulence, which limits the sharpness of images taken from this vantage point. (The effects of atmospheric turbulence are clear to anyone looking at the stars ? this is why they appear to twinkle.)</span>

 

In space, however, telescopes are able to get a clearer shot of everything from exploding stars to other galaxies.

Another disadvantage for ground-based telescopes is that the Earth's atmosphere absorbs much of the infrared and ultraviolet light that passes through it. Space telescopes can detect these waves.

Newer ground-based telescopes are using technological advances such as adaptive optics to try to correct or limit atmospheric distortion, but there's no way to see the wavelengths that the atmosphere blocks from reaching Earth, according to the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI), which manages the Hubble research program.

<span>One downside to space telescopes like the Hubble is that they are extremely difficult to maintain and upgrade. The Hubble is the first telescope specifically designed to be repaired in space by astronauts, while other space telescopes cannot be serviced at all.</span>

<span>NASA scientists estimate that the telescope will only be able to keep taking pictures for five more years.</span>

You might be interested in
if a football player does 39,000 J of work, how much power does the football player exert in 5 minutes?
elena-s [515]

Power = Work / Time

= 39000 / 5

= 7800 J/s

7 0
4 years ago
What is the difference between vehicle borne and vector borne transmission?
Ugo [173]
Vehicle borne transmission is an indirect transmission of an infectious organism when the host of the organism is in contact with another potential host. Vector borne, on the other hand, happens when there is a transmitter involved causing the spread of the disease. This transmitter is called the vector.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Unpolarized light is passed through an optical filter that is oriented in the vertical direction.
VashaNatasha [74]

In order to solve this problem it is necessary to apply the concepts related to intensity and specifically described in Malus's law.

Malus's law warns that

I = I_0 cos^2\theta

Where,

\theta= Angle between the analyzer axis and the polarization axis

I_0 =Intensity of the light before passing through the polarizer

The intensity of the beam from the first polarizer is equal to the half of the initial intensity

I = \frac{I_0}{2}

Replacing with our the numerical values we get

I = \frac{46}{2}

I = 23W/m^2

Therefore the  intensity of the light that emerges from the filter is 23W/m^2

5 0
3 years ago
Why can someone please help me out
denis23 [38]
D I think hope this helps
4 0
3 years ago
Your friend asks you to describe pseudoscience. You reply pseudoscience is
oksian1 [2.3K]
The answer is most likely D. hope that helped 
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How does water return to the oceans from the land
    7·1 answer
  • There are four stages in an economic recovery. In which order do these stages occur
    15·1 answer
  • How much work can a 22kw car engine do in 60 seconds
    6·2 answers
  • A train travelling at a speed of 108km/h.how much distance is it traveling every second ?
    6·1 answer
  • Many scientists are involved in research studying global climate change. Which limitation to climate research could
    12·1 answer
  • What instrument measures air temperature?
    15·1 answer
  • Three importance of SI system​
    8·1 answer
  • An optical disk drive in your computer can spin a disk up to 10,000 rpm (about 1045 rad/s1045 rad/s ). If a particular disk is s
    11·1 answer
  • Using organisms such as fungi to detoxify a polluted area is called
    10·1 answer
  • A ray of light crosses a boundary between two transparent materials. The medium the ray enters has a larger index of refraction.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!