BRAINLIEST!!!!!!!!
2 answers:
You might be interested in
The graph that represents the inequality has been shown in the attachment.
<h3>How to solve for the graph</h3>We have these equations
y ≤ −3x + 1
y ≤ x + 3
We remove the inequality sign from both of these equations
y = −3x + 1
y = x + 3
−3x + 1 = x + 3
such that
x = -0.5
we use this value for x in any of the equations
x + 3 = -0.5 + 3
= 2.5
the point of intersection is at 2.5, -0.5
we test for the origin. 0,0
3x + 1
= 3*0 + 1
= 1
for x + 3
0+3 = 3
This is 0≤1 and 0≤3
Hence the graph should be shaded to the origin.
Read more on a graph here: brainly.com/question/14030149
#SPJ1
well, we're assuming all along that Merina owes Bradford $2000, because in the 1st scenario, she was going to pay twice $1000.
on the 2nd scenario, she'll be paying the same $2000 but split 7 months from now and then 7 months later, same 2000 bucks, at which point Bradford applied 8.5% interest.
using those assumptions, since the wording is not quite clear, we can say that Merina is simply paying 2000 bucks plus the 8.5%
Answer:
2.83
Step-by-step explanation:
using the pythagorean theorem, ≈