Answer:
No, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’.
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The rule of the reflection across the line y=x is equal to
(x,y) -------> (y,x)
so
A(-6,6) -------> A'(6,-6) ----> is ok
B(-3,3) ------> B'(3,-3) ----> is ok
C(-8,2) ------> C'(8,-2) ----> is not ok ( is not a reflection acros the line y=x)
therefore
The triangles are no t congruent, because the reflection of ABC is not congruent to A’B’C’
Answer:f(x)=x2 +1
Step-by-step explanation:
The one represents C in the standard form and it can also be used to represent graph placement so +1 can also represent the vertex going up 1 on the y
I'm assuming you want to know what 45% of 360 is.....
so you multiply 360 by 0.45 (since 45 is a percent, and to revert it back, you must move the decimal 2 times to the left) and you have your answer...
Answer:
D. She uses Squeaky’s thoughts and words to tell readers about her character.
False, because when you connect them the don't even look like a line.
Hope this helps! ;)
