Answer:
-7/4
Step-by-step explanation:
You are looking for the composite g(f(2)). The simplest way to solve this is to evaluate f(2) and enter the solution in to your g function.
g(f(2))=g(-(2)^2-2(2)+4)=g(-4-4+4)=g(-4)
g(-4)=4/(-4(-4)-2)=4/(16-2)=4/14=2/7
Therfor, g(f(2))=2/7 **I'm assuming the -4x-2 is all in the denominator of the g(x) function. If -2 is not in the denominator you would have
g(f(2))=4/(-4(-4)) -2=4/16 -2=1/4 -2=1/4-8/4= -7/4
Answer:
add an answer bro
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's let the weight of a large box be L, and the weight of a small box be S.
We know that 5 large boxes and 3 small boxes is 120kg, so:
5L + 3S = 120
We also know that 7 large boxes and 9 small boxes is 234kg, so:
7L + 9S = 234
You can multiply the first equation by 3 to get:
15L + 9S = 360
See how now both equations have 9S? We can now subtract one from the other:
(15L+9S) - (7L+9S) = 360-234
8L = 126
L = 15.75
Now sub this value back into an equation:
(5x15.75) + 3S = 120
3S = 41.25
S = 13.75
Double check these values
(7x15.75) + (9x13.75)
= 110.25 + 123.75
=234, which is consistent with above.
So a large box is 15.75kg, and a small box is 13.75kg.
Hope this helped
Replace x in the equations and see which one gets the matching y :
-5(0) = 0 +1 = 1
-5(1) = -5 + 1 = -4
-5(-1) = 5 +6 = 6
The first equation works.
The answer is -2 because the the next one is -3