Chlorophyll is what captures the light
Explanation:
It depends on what you mean by logical.
As far as modern societ knows, time travel has not been invented yet. In this sense, no traveling backward in time is not logical.
If we move past this known hurdle, then we can also define logical by perserving the former era's authenticity. Since we would be from the future, we could easily (and even accidentally) introduce new concepts, ideas, and inventions that would otherwise never have been thought of or created at that time. This changes both the past and future which means it is not logically possible to live in a former era without it changing the course of history entirely.
Another obstacle would be just the imbalance in general. Since we did not originally exist in the former era, we would affect everything around us. For instance, say we meet a stranger who we fall in love with and have children. Now they will never be with their intended partner or have the children they were supposed to have. Imagine if the children who no longer existed were extremely important to the foundations of education or society, such as Albert Einstein.
Overall, if we were to live in a former era everything from the past to the future would be altered so we could never logically experience the former era in its true nature. However, disregarding the fact time travel doesn't exist at the moment, it is - at the bare minimum - logically possible to live in a former era.
The answer is 6, 2, 1, 8, 4, 3, 5, 7
Answer:
B
Explanation: Hope you get it right!
Answer:
Improvised performance
Explanation:
When a person does something without having a plan in mind but comes up with things in the moment is called improvisation.
John was asked to make a toast in a Filipino engagement. He had no idea what other people were expecting of him, nor did he know whether the content of his toast would resonate with people in the audience. So, he did not prepare anything and gave the toast.
Hence, John engaged in an improvised performance