<span>The right answer for this question is C. Although more recently the constitution considers issues of legislation, the first State constitutions focused mainly on establishing a unitary system of government. This is unsurprising, as without a stable government, how can legislation be effectively put in place?</span>
The Constitution, with its 27 amendments<span>, has been amended only 17 times since the first 10—which make up the Bill of Rights—were ratified in 1791.</span>
<u>"confirming that it is not an online source" </u>is wrong. The problem is not the fact the source is online, but if it's credible.
<u>"determining whether or not it is well-known" </u>well-known sources might still be wrong. Being known does not make something true.
<u>"d. determining whether it is a secondary source" </u>again, it has nothing at all to do with the validity of the source.
So the answer is:
b. checking its conclusions against other sources
The best way is to check the source and compare to different ones that talk about the same subject. Comparing different conclusions of different authors and seeing different points of view about the same thing is often the best way.
Answer:
If the states were each independent america would fail. The reason the states would fail is because each of them usually has a smaller population. Nor do they have much defense against each other.
During the expansion of the Islamic caliphate, the Muslim
rule was often preferred to the Persian or the byzantine because of the main
reason that the caliphate extracts few taxes from its conquered populations
than the empire that it resides.
