Answer:
b. Positive psychology
Explanation:
Humanistic theories of personality have helped fuel research into character strengths, happiness, and thriving. In other words, the humanistic approach has aided in the growth of positive psychology.
A positive psychology can be defined as a broad range of science that typically deals with only the positive aspects of an individual's life. Thus, positive psychology is mainly centered around being happy, joyous, flourishing, thriving, character strength, well-being etc.
Hence, positive psychology reinforces positivity rather than negativity such as bitterness, sadness etc.
Answer:
Situational influence.
Explanation:
Situational influences are temporary conditions that affect buyers. Just as the exercise describes, Diane is affected by a temporary and casual condition: a long queue. Therefore, she decides to go to another store. Situational influences can be social, physical or time factors or the buyer's mood. For example, an anxious or hurried person won't be waiting in a long checkout.
Answer:
Option B: compounds
Explanation:
Elements can be chemically combined into compounds, therefore, a compound consists of two or more elements combined, in fixed rstios, by chemical means.
The <span> governor would be the answer</span>
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
