1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
3 years ago
11

There are 5.65 calories in one gram of fat. True False

Biology
1 answer:
Thepotemich [5.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

False: 9 calories

Explanation:

Fat has more than twice as many calories per gram as carbohydrates and proteins. A gram of fat has about 9 calories, while a gram of carbohydrate or protein has about 4 calories. In other words, you could eat twice as much carbohydrates or proteins as fat for the same amount of calories.

CREDIT: https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/4182-fat-and-calories

(I honestly don't know.... I just googled it)

You might be interested in
Enzymes only work with specific substrates because each substrate
kobusy [5.1K]
<span>it has a specific activation site for enzyme attachment</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Predisposing factors associated with pyelonephritis include:.
Luden [163]
Urinary obstruction, Neurogenic bladder, Catheterization, Pregnancy and diabetes
8 0
2 years ago
Which of the following does not describe a function of aggressive animal behavior?
nalin [4]

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Aggressive behaviour is a act of violence not without it

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Question: Using your understanding of the 4 macromolecules explain how Earth’s early atmosphere and the 4 molecules taught could
Zielflug [23.3K]

Answer:

Advanced forms of life existed on earth at least 3.55 billion years ago. In rocks of that age, fossilized imprints have been found of bacteria that look uncannily like cyanobacteria, the most highly evolved photosynthetic organisms present in the world today. Carbon deposits enriched in the lighter carbon-12 isotope over the heavier carbon-13 isotope-a sign of biological carbon assimilation-attest to an even older age. On the other hand, it is believed that our young planet, still in the throes of volcanic eruptions and battered by falling comets and asteroids, remained inhospitable to life for about half a billion years after its birth, together with the rest of the solar system, some 4.55 billion years ago. This leaves a window of perhaps 200-300 million years for the appearance of life on earth.

divine interventionThis duration was once considered too short for the emergence of something as complex as a living cell. Hence suggestions were made that germs of life may have come to earth from outer space with cometary dust or even, as proposed by Francis Crick of DNA double-helix fame, on a spaceship sent out by some distant civilization. No evidence in support of these proposals has yet been obtained. Meanwhile the reason for making them has largely disappeared. It is now generally agreed that if life arose spontaneously by natural processes-a necessary assumption if we wish to remain within the realm of science-it must have arisen fairly quickly, more in a matter of millennia or centuries, perhaps even less, than in millions of years. Even if life came from elsewhere, we would still have to account for its first development. Thus we might as well assume that life started on earth.

How this momentous event happened is still highly conjectural, though no longer purely speculative. The clues come from the earth, from outer space, from laboratory experiments, and, especially, from life itself. The history of life on earth is written in the cells and molecules of existing organisms. Thanks to the advances of cell biology, biochemistry and molecular biology, scientists are becoming increasingly adept at reading the text.

An important rule in this exercise is to reconstruct the earliest events in life's history without assuming they proceeded with the benefit of foresight. Every step must be accounted for in terms of antecedent and concomitant events. Each must stand on its own and cannot be viewed as a preparation for things to come. Any hint of teleology must be avoided.

3 0
3 years ago
Which is a natural factor that causes long-term climate change?
Ivahew [28]

Answer:

volcanic eruption and solar variation

mark as brainliest

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When it comes to being sick or having a disease, do you know if you have a bacterial or viral infection? Many people don't know
    6·2 answers
  • Which is mismatched? cytoplasm - dense, gelatinous solution nucleoid - hereditary material inclusions - excess cell nutrients an
    14·1 answer
  • As of 2009, all living human beings have had their entire genome sequenced.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not true of cells? (4 points) Cells are living. Not all cells are the same. Some cells are living and
    12·1 answer
  • One adaptation to life in flowing water is _____.
    5·2 answers
  • A galvanometer is a device that measures small currents.<br> a. True<br> b. False
    13·2 answers
  • There appears to be some relationship between population density and the presence of large dead zones. Can you explain why dead
    11·1 answer
  • What is an example of reactivity?
    7·2 answers
  • What process takes place at the boundary between the capillaries and the alveoli?
    11·2 answers
  • What is the difference between prokaryotes and eukaryotes? In your answer use the terms nucleus, nucleoid, organelles, size, cyt
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!