All categories

3 years ago

In her study of real estate and inequality, graduate student shania looks for the "aspen effect." she is looking for:

1 answer:

7 0

Aspen Effect is the outcome of increased economical inequality causing the middle class people to commute long distance for serving the socially wealthy people. In real state, Aspen denotes the wealthy communities and to meet their needs of service, people from service industry, most of them being middle class people and with low wage, travel back and forth. They commute long distance because the service provider simply cannot afford to live by renting or buying housing in the wealthy Aspen communities. Such long hours requirement of commute cause traffic congestion and other challenges. This effect was termed as Aspen Effect by the Cornell University Economics professor Robert H. Frank.

You might be interested in

The asymmetric information problem in the market for healthcare services is _______.

Vinil7 [7]

Answer:

Explanation:

Asymmetric information is an instance of market failure.

It is when one party to a transaction possesses greater information or knowledge than the other party. e.g. when a seller possesses greater information than the buyer or when a buyer possesses greater information than the seller.

Individuals know when they have a more healthy lifestyle while their insurers might not be privy to such information due to privacy laws

8 0

3 years ago

Problem 14-13 Calculating the WACC [LO3] Dinklage Corp. has 4 million shares of common stock outstanding. The current share pric

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

WACC = 8.97%

Explanation:

total value of equity = $70 x 4,000,000 = $280,000,000

cost of equity:

$70 = $4.4935 / (Re - 4.5%)

Re - 4.5% = 6.42%

Re = 10.92%

total value of debt:

$75 million x 0.95 = $71,250,000

YTM = {70 + [(1,000 - 950)/25]} / [(1,000 + 950)/2] = 72 / 975 = 7.3846%

$60 million x 1.07 = $64,200,000

YTM = {60 + [(1,000 - 1,070)/8]} / [(1,000 + 1,070)/2] = 51.25 / 1,035 = 4.9517%

weighted cost of debt = ($71,250,000 / $135,450,000 x 7.3846%) + ($64,200,000 / $135,450,000 x 4.9517%) = 3.8845% + 2.347% = 6.2315%

total value of the firm = $280,000,000 + $135,450,000 = $415,450,000

equity weight = $280,000,000 / $415,450,000 = 0.674

debt weight = 1 - 0.674 = 0.326

WACC = (0.674 x 10.92%) + (0.326 x 6.2315% x 0.79) = 7.36% + 1.605% = 8.965% = 8.97%

8 0

3 years ago

Both country 1 and country 2 are located on their respective production possibilities frontiers (PPFs) for consumer goods and ca

nikdorinn [45]

Answer:

A) Country 1's PPF lies further to the right than country 2's PPF.

Explanation:

Production Possibility Curve shows the combination of two goods, that an economy can produce - by utilising given resources & technology best efficiently.

If country 1 produces twice the output of both goods compared to country 2. Then, country 1's PPF would lie further to the right than country 2's PPF. As, more quantities implies rightward shifted PPC, signifying more quantities of goods that can be produced.

Efficient or inefficient production leads to production inside or on PPC, doesn't shift PPC. Population change is also irrelevant in this case.

7 0

3 years ago

Gelb Company currently manufactures 43,000 units per year of a key component for its manufacturing process. Variable costs are $

Mashutka [201]

Answer:

It is cheaper to buy the component. At this level of production by $40,750.

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Production= 43,000 units

Variable costs are $2.95 per unit

Avoidable Fixed costs= $73,000 per year

Unavoidable fixed costs= $77,500 per year.

The company is considering buying this component from a supplier for $3.70 per unit.

We need to calculate the cost of producing and buying and choose the best option.

Production:

Total cost= 43,000*2.95 + 73,000= $199,850

Buy:

Total cost= 43,000*3.7= $159,100

It is cheaper to buy the component. At this level of production by $40,750.

8 0

3 years ago

It is characteristic of – goods that they are not used up in the short run. A society can choose to – some quality of life now—f

LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

It is characteristic of CAPITAL goods that they are not used up in the short run. A society can choose to SACRIFICE some quality of life now BY PURCHASING fewer consumer goods ANS SAVING MONEY in order to build up its stock of capital goods. This will lead to a HIGHER QUALITY OF LIFE and more consumer goods PURCHASED AND CONSUMED later on.

Explanation:

A consumer can choose between saving and spending money, that is measured by the marginal propensity to consume or the marginal propensity to save. Money that is spent now, will provide a certain satisfaction in the present, but nothing in the future. Money saved will not provide a certain satisfaction in the present, but should provide much more satisfaction in the future since it should grow as time passes.

8 0

3 years ago