1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shtirl [24]
3 years ago
9

A cable is 50 decimeters long. How long is the cable in meters?

Mathematics
2 answers:
Snezhnost [94]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<h2><u>5 Meters</u></h2>

Step-by-step explanation:

10 decimeters is 1 Meter

ratelena [41]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The cable is 5 Meters long.

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in
1/2(4x+10)=2 i need to get x
kari74 [83]
First you need to distribute the 1/2 by the numbers in the parentheses
1/2•4x and 1/2•10 which equals
2x+5=10

next, you will need to get the 2x by itself so you would do
2x+5=10
-5=-5
2x=5

finally, you divide the 2 by the 5 so you can get the x by itself
2x divided by 5

the answer is: x=2.5
8 0
3 years ago
Alana biked 45 miles in 3 hours. How many miles did she bike per hour?
krok68 [10]
15 miles per hour.
Divide the number of miles by the number of hours to get the miles per hour.
5 0
3 years ago
Suppose a baseball player had 229 hits in a season. In the given probability distribution, the random variable x represents the
Andru [333]

Answer:

a) summation of p(x)/n ie. (0.1712+...+0.0051)/6=0.16675

b)1

c).var=summation (x-mean) squared /n ie (0.1712-0.16675)squared +...+(0.0051-0.16675)squared/n=0.027351948

SD =square root of variance =0.16538

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Suppose that we don't have a formula for g(x) but we know that g(3) = −5 and g'(x) = x2 + 7 for all x. (
True [87]
So it tells us that g(3) = -5 and g'(x) = x^2 + 7.

So g(3) = -5 is the point (3, -5)
Using linear approximation
g(2.99) is the point (2.99, g(3) + g'(3)*(2.99-3))

now we just need to simplify that
(2.99, -5 + (16)*(-.01)) which is (2.99, -5 + -.16) which is (2.99, -5.16)
So g(2.99) = -5.16 

Doing the same thing for the other g(3.01)
(3.01, g(3) + g'(3)*(3.01-3))
(3.01, -5 + 16*.01) which is (3.01, -4.84)
So g(3.01) = -4.84

So we have our linear approximation for the two. 

If you wanted to, you could check your answer by finding g(x).  Since you know g'(x), take the antiderivative and we will get 
g(x) = 1/3x^3 + 7x + C
Since we know g(3) = -5, we can use that to solve for C
1/3(3)^3 + 7(3) + C = -5 and we find that C = -35
so that means g(x) = (x^3)/3 + 7x - 35

So just to check our linear approximations use that to find g(2.99) and g(3.01)

g(2.99) = -5.1597
g(3.01) = -4.8397

So as you can see, using the linear approximation we got our answers as
g(2.99) = -5.16
g(3.01) = -4.84
which are both really close to the actual answer.  Not a bad method if you ever need to use it. 
5 0
3 years ago
Suppose you are interested in the effect of skipping lectures (in days missed) on college grades. You also have ACT scores and h
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

a) For this case the intercept of 2.52 represent a common effect of measure for any student without taking in count the other variables analyzed, and we know that if HSGPA=0, ACT= 0 and skip =0 we got colGPA=2.52

b) This value represent the effect into the ACT scores in the GPA, we know that:

\hat \beta_{ACT} = 0.015

So then for every unit increase in the ACT score we expect and increase of 0.015 in the GPA or the predicted variable

c) If we are interested in analyze if we have a significant relationship between the dependent and the independent variable we can use the following system of hypothesis:

Null Hypothesis: \beta_i = 0

Alternative hypothesis: \beta_i \neq 0

Or in other wouds we want to check if an specific slope is significant.

The significance level assumed for this case is \alpha=0.05

Th degrees of freedom for a linear regression is given by df=n-p-1 = 45-3-1 = 41, where p =3 the number of variables used to estimate the dependent variable.

In order to test the hypothesis the statistic is given by:

t=\frac{\hat \beta_i}{SE_{\beta_i}}

And replacing we got:

t = \frac{-0.5}{0.0001}=-5000

And for this case we see that if we find the p value for this case we will get a value very near to 0, so then we can conclude that this coefficient would be significant for the regression model .

Step-by-step explanation:

For this case we have the following multiple regression model calculated:

colGPA =2.52+0.38*HSGPA+0.015*ACT-0.5*skip

Part a

(a) Interpret the intercept in this model.

For this case the intercept of 2.52 represent a common effect of measure for any student without taking in count the other variables analyzed, and we know that if HSGPA=0, ACT= 0 and skip =0 we got colGPA=2.52

(b) Interpret \hat \beta_{ACT} from this model.

This value represent the effect into the ACT scores in the GPA, we know that:

\hat \beta_{ACT} = 0.015

So then for every unit increase in the ACT score we expect and increase of 0.015 in the GPA or the predicted variable

(c) What is the predicted college GPA for someone who scored a 25 on the ACT, had a 3.2 high school GPA and missed 4 lectures. Show your work.

For this case we can use the regression model and we got:

colGPA =2.52 +0.38*3.2 +0.015*25 - 0.5*4 = 26.751

(d) Is the estimate of skipping class statistically significant? How do you know? Is the estimate of skipping class economically significant? How do you know? (Hint: Suppose there are 45 lectures in a typical semester long class).

If we are interested in analyze if we have a significant relationship between the dependent and the independent variable we can use the following system of hypothesis:

Null Hypothesis: \beta_i = 0

Alternative hypothesis: \beta_i \neq 0

Or in other wouds we want to check if an specific slope is significant.

The significance level assumed for this case is \alpha=0.05

Th degrees of freedom for a linear regression is given by df=n-p-1 = 45-3-1 = 41, where p =3 the number of variables used to estimate the dependent variable.

In order to test the hypothesis the statistic is given by:

t=\frac{\hat \beta_i}{SE_{\beta_i}}

And replacing we got:

t = \frac{-0.5}{0.0001}=-5000

And for this case we see that if we find the p value for this case we will get a value very near to 0, so then we can conclude that this coefficient would be significant for the regression model .

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Y - 1 &gt; -7 A.y ≥ -6 B.y &gt; -6 C.y -8
    15·1 answer
  • Help?<br> Would the answer for this be (-9,3) or (3,9) or (9,-3) or (-9,-3)???
    6·1 answer
  • Candy buys 20 ounces of mixed nuts. She puts an equal number of ounces in each of three bags how many ounces of mixers will be i
    7·1 answer
  • Which shape has a larger area: a rectangle that is 7 inches by 3/4 inch or a square with side length of 2 1/2 inches
    9·1 answer
  • What is 2 1/3 in simplest form ?
    10·1 answer
  • (X-3)^2=25 i need to find all the solutions to the equation
    15·2 answers
  • PLS HELP. AND SHOW WORK !!! NO BOTS PLS IM TIRED
    12·1 answer
  • Factorize (2u+3u)(u+v)-2u+3v​
    11·1 answer
  • At a park, it costs $9.75 an hour to rent a bicycle. It costs $7.25 an hour to rent a scooter. Aaron has a coupon
    13·2 answers
  • The function f(x) = -(x+4)^2+5 is written in vertex form and shows that the vertex of the graph of f is located at (-4,5)
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!