Answer:
It should be greater than $36
Explanation:
The opportunity cost of working is the amount of money sacrificed or could have earned if the individual was not working. In this case, Claire has decided to go with her friend which means that the opportunity cost of not working is less than the benefits receives from going out. Because she is not working it means that the opportunity cost of working is more than 36 dollars, which is the income she could have earned in 3 hours.
Answer:
It is more profitable to sell the units as-is.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Number of units= 12,600
Varto has two alternatives for these items:
(1) they can be sold to a wholesaler for $13 each
(2) they can be processed further for $272,300 and then sold for $34 each.
The first cost of $31 is a sunk cost, it will remain no matter which option is chosen. We will not take it into account for the decision making process.
Option 1:
Effect on income= 12,600*13= $163,800
Option 2:
Effect on income= 12,600*34 - 272,300= $156,100
It is more profitable to sell the units as-is.
Answer:
400
Explanation:
Qd = 45 - 2P
Qd = -15 + P
45 - 2P = P - 15
60 = 3P
60/3 = P = 20
Q = 45 - 2*20 = 5
Q = -15+20 = 5
The quantity will be 5 and price 20
<u>Now we will caclulate the consumer surplus:</u>
Which the area of the demand curve above the equilibrium.
We calculate he area of a triangle:
base x high / 2
consumer surplus = 400
Answer:c. Debit Interest Receivable, $4,000; credit Interest Revenue, $4,000.
Explanation:
The interest payable = Principal x Rate x Time (period)
= $100,000 x 12% x 4/12 ( September to December)
$100,000 x 0.12 x 1/3
$100,000 x 0.04
=$4000
Journal entry to record accrued interest at Year end for loan issued on sept 1st.
Date Account titles Debit Credit
Dec 31st Interest Receivable $4000
Interest Revenue $4000
Answer: (a) $197,500
(b) $ 189,500
Explanation:
Given : The marginal cost function : 
To find the cost function, we need to integrate the above function with respect to x.
Now, the additional cost incurred in dollars when production is increased from 100 units to 150 units will be:-
![\int^{150}_{100}\ C'(x)\ dx\\\\=\int^{150}_{100} (4000-0.4x)\ dx\\\\=[4000x-\dfrac{0.4x^2}{2}]^{150}_{100}\\\\=[4000(150)-\dfrac{0.4(150)^2}{2}-4000(100)+\dfrac{0.4(100)^2}{2}]\\\\=[600000-4500-400000+2000]\\\\=197500](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cint%5E%7B150%7D_%7B100%7D%5C%20C%27%28x%29%5C%20dx%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5Cint%5E%7B150%7D_%7B100%7D%20%284000-0.4x%29%5C%20dx%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B4000x-%5Cdfrac%7B0.4x%5E2%7D%7B2%7D%5D%5E%7B150%7D_%7B100%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B4000%28150%29-%5Cdfrac%7B0.4%28150%29%5E2%7D%7B2%7D-4000%28100%29%2B%5Cdfrac%7B0.4%28100%29%5E2%7D%7B2%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B600000-4500-400000%2B2000%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D197500)
Hence, the additional cost incurred in dollars when production is increased from 100 units to 150 units= $197,500
Similarly, the additional cost incurred in dollars when production is increased from 500 units to 550 units :-
![\int^{550}_{500}\ C'(x)\ dx\\\\=\int^{550}_{500} (4000-0.4x)\ dx\\\\=[4000x-\dfrac{0.4x^2}{2}]^{550}_{500}\\\\=[4000(550)-\dfrac{0.4(550)^2}{2}-4000(500)+\dfrac{0.4(500)^2}{2}]\\\\=[2200000-60500-2000000+50000]\\\\=189,500](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cint%5E%7B550%7D_%7B500%7D%5C%20C%27%28x%29%5C%20dx%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5Cint%5E%7B550%7D_%7B500%7D%20%284000-0.4x%29%5C%20dx%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B4000x-%5Cdfrac%7B0.4x%5E2%7D%7B2%7D%5D%5E%7B550%7D_%7B500%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B4000%28550%29-%5Cdfrac%7B0.4%28550%29%5E2%7D%7B2%7D-4000%28500%29%2B%5Cdfrac%7B0.4%28500%29%5E2%7D%7B2%7D%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B2200000-60500-2000000%2B50000%5D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D189%2C500)
Hence, the additional cost incurred in dollars when production is increased from 500 units to 550 units = $ 189,500
