Answer:
The answer is a
Explanation:
Inactivity does not make your muscle turn to fat, when you exercise fat dissolves and muscle replaces it after some time.
Answer:
The correct answer is "Weight loss".
Explanation:
- If the influence of material is such that it adversely affects the attachment of NAD+ to electrodes, it can help people lose weight. This because it will indeed necessarily imply that perhaps the ATP throughout the cells would've been whittled down unless the compound NADH could not have been established.
- This also suggests that because the body doesn't obtain adequate ATP, this also contributes to the breakdown of fat into some kind of type of stored energy which always promotes weight loss throughout the turn.
Answer:
1. IV: Time the Bell is rang DV: Time it takes to learn the task
2. IV: Nitrogen fertilizers DV: Diversity of fish
3. IV: Time of radiation DV: Percentage of successful germination
Explanation:
The independent variable of an experiment refers to the variable that the experimenter manipulates or changes in order to effect a measurable response in the dependent variable while the dependent variable is the variable that responds to the changes made to the independent variable.
1. In scenario 1, the TIME THE BELL RINGS is the independent variable because that is what the experimenter controls or has power to change. On the other hand, the dependent variable is the TIME IT TAKES TO LEARN THE TASK because it is the measured variable that responds to the independent variable.
2. In scenario 2, the USE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER is the independent variable while the DIVERSITY OF FISH is the dependent variable.
3. In case 3, the TIME OF RADIATION is the independent variable while the PERCENTAGE OF SUCCESSFUL GERMINATION is the dependent variable.
Answer:
Explanation:
It's hard to tell. I was looking at a diagram representing the atmosphere. 50 miles is right on the edge of the Mesosphere. The temperature is about - 135 or so. It does climb up to about - 49 according to the Royal BC Museum.
Answer:
The answer is <em>false</em>.
Explanation:
Although very popular in crime novels and TV shows, microscopic hair analysis isn't as reliable as it may seem. It was widely used during 1950-s and 1960-s as the best test to match a hair sample with the suspect, but modern tests proved it to be wrong. Microscopic analysis can give some information about the hair sample such as origin (human, animal or synthetic fiber), color, pigment distribution... For example, if the hair sample found was brown, and the suspect was black-haired, we could claim that he was Innocent. But if the found hair was black, does that mean that we could be absolutely sure that the suspect is guilty? Of course not, microscopic analysis can not provide evidence for that claim. On the other hand, the best method for matching biological samples, at the present time, is DNA analysis.
