I’m pretty sure it’s true
The answer for this issue is:
The chemical equation is: HBz + H2O <- - > H3O+ + Bz-
Ka = 6.4X10^-5 = [H3O+][Bz-]/[HBz]
Let x = [H3O+] = [Bz-], and [HBz] = 0.5 - x.
Accept that x is little contrasted with 0.5 M. At that point,
Ka = 6.4X10^-5 = x^2/0.5
x = [H3O+] = 5.6X10^-3 M
pH = 2.25
(x is without a doubt little contrasted with 0.5, so the presumption above was OK to make)
It is called a waxxing gibbous, pls brainliest
25/2 and 96/X
CROSS MULTIPLY.
2x=2,400.
divide by 2.
x=1,200.
you take the GIVEN MASS of an element, and you put it on top, the coefficient is what it’s over. i believe this is right
The molar mass is usually referred to with
M
, while the mass is referred to as
m
. The amount of substance is
n
. This gives you the following relationship:
=
M
=
m
n
Since you have given (C3H8)=11 g
m
(
C
3
H
8
)
=
11
g
and you already looked up (C3H8)=44.1 gmol−1
M
(
C
3
H
8
)
=
44.1
g
m
o
l
−
1
, you can use this formula to determine (C3H8)
n
(
C
3
H
8
)
.
In this question it is quite hard to explain the use of significant figures. Those are used to imply a certain inaccuracy. Not enough information is given by the question, as of how accurate the measurement is. It is a mere exercise of converting one property into another. Here you should not worry about it.
