Answer:
-3
Step-by-step explanation:
If we directly evaluate the function at -1, we get 0/0, meaning we may still have a limit to find.
In this case, factoring the polynomial at the top would be helpful.
The polynomial can be factored to (x+1)(x-2), so the function would now turn out to be (x+1)(x-2)/(x+1)
The (x+1) cancel out, leaving you with (x-2), which you can directly evaluate by plugging in x as -1:
-1-2 = -3
Quick disclaimer: the function is still undefined at -1; it's just that the function gets closer and closer to -3 as you approach -1.
I hope this helped you.
Answer:
True
Step-by-step explanation:
Hi, the statement is true, because to divide a fraction we have to turn the second fraction upside down and multiply them. Since a whole number x can be written as x/1, it also applies to the case of dividing a fraction by a whole number.
We can prove it with an example.
Dividing a unit fraction by a whole number
1/2 ÷ 2 = (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4
Multiplying the unit fractions by a unit fraction with a whole number as a denominator
1/2 x 1/2= (1x1) / (2x2) = 1/4
<span>740,679,835 km i hope this helps you
</span>
Answer:
23.4 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
If the base of the triangle is half of that of a given side, then we need to divide the given side by 2 to get the base.
46.8
---------2
23.4
There is your answer
Hope it helped
Bye
