Answer: Disjunctive
Explanation: A disjunctive concept is one characterized by either one of several concepts. Disjunctive concept is characterized based on the possession of at least one of any set of attribute characterizing a particular activity or action. For an event to occur, it should posses a certain feature or another in a given set of features required for such event to take place.
In the scenario above, once either one of the two events(1 and 2) occurs, then we have a 'strike'.
Answer:
Qualitative data
Explanation:
The question produces a variable that is binomial, because it only allows two answers or categories:
"<em>Yes" or "No"</em>
If it were a quantitative question, it would allow the respondent to give an answer that generates a numerical/quantitative variable, for example, <em>how old are you?</em>
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
Ok.. what are the rail roads used for? Trains.
1. they were faster
2. moved on land
3. and carried more passengers
1 a tag line from a dating profile 2 sounds like she’s trying too hard to sound cute to be honest
