All categories

3 years ago

Do the following side lengths form a right triangle? Explain. 18 ft, 23 ft, 29 ft

Mathematics

1 answer:

bekas [8.4K]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explaination:

Step-by-step explanation:

B: yes; 18^2 + 29^2=1165(equal sign with slash) 23^2

You might be interested in

Use elimination to solve only number 7

anzhelika [568]

So the vs eliminate each other which leaves the ws and the 1,7. Then you add the 2 ws to get 2w and then add the numbers to get 2w=8, then divide 8 by 2 and you get w=4

7 0

3 years ago

Jose, baulus, and George are having a disagreement over interest rates. Jose says that 6 3/4% can be expressed as 6.75%. George

otez555 [7]

Answer:

Jose and George are correct

Baulus is incorrect

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$6\frac{3}{4}$ %

Required

Compare the above expression with

Jose: 6.75%.

George: 0.0675

Baulus: 0.0675%

The expression  $6\frac{3}{4}$ % is given as a mixed fraction;

In Jose's case, he simply converted it to decimal

Converting $6\frac{3}{4}$ % to decimal;

First, we need to convert to improper fraction

$6\frac{3}{4}$ % in improper fraction is $\frac{27}{4}$ %

Then, we divide the numerator by the denominator

$\frac{27}{4}$ % = 6.75%.

Hence, Jose is correct

In George's case, he solved further by removing the % from Jose's answer.

% means divided by 100; In other words, x% means that we divide x by 100

So, 6.75% means we divide 6.75 by 100

$\frac{6.75}{100}$ = 0.0675

Hence, George is also correct

But same can't be said of Baulus;

Baulus converted $6\frac{3}{4}$ % as 0.0675%

This means that he converted $6\frac{3}{4}$ as 0.0675 then he appended it with the percentage sign (%)

Since $6\frac{3}{4}$ is not equal to 0.0675, then we can conclude that Baulus is incorrect

8 0

4 years ago

Geometry > 0.6 Area of sectors XZQ

Ratling [72]

Answer:

4π mi²

Step-by-step explanation:

s = (∅/360) * πr²

s = (135/360) * π(4²)

s = (135/360)(16) * π

s = 4π mi²

3 0

3 years ago

Ben kaç yasındayım A 12 B 10 C 8 D 14

Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

?????????????????

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

A restaurant offers a $12 dinner special that has 77 choices for an appetizer, 1010 choices for an entrée, and 44 choices for

krok68 [10]

280 I'm assuming that this question is badly formatted and that the actual number of appetizers is 7, the number of entres is 10, and that there's 4 choices of desserts. So let's take each course by itself. You can choose 1 of 7 appetizers. So we have n = 7 After that, you chose an entre, so the number of possible meals to this point is n = 7 * 10 = 70 Finally, you finish off with a dessert, so the number of meals is: n = 70 * 4 = 280 Therefore the number of possible meals you can have is 280. Note: If the values of 77, 1010 and 44 aren't errors, but are actually correct, then the number of meals is n = 77 * 1010 * 44 = 3421880 But I believe that it's highly unlikely that the numbers in this problem are correct. Just imagine the amount of time it would take for someone to read a menu with over a thousand entres in it. And working in that kitchen would be an absolute nightmare.

5 0

3 years ago