Answer:
0.645 L
Explanation:
To find the volume, you need to (1) convert grams to moles (using the molar mass) and then (2) calculate the volume (using the molarity ratio). The final answer should have 3 sig figs to match the sig figs of the given values.
(Step 1)
Molar Mass (KOH): 39.098 g/mol + 15.998 g/mol + 1.008 g/mol
Molar Mass (KOH): 56.104 g/mol
19.9 grams KOH 1 mole
-------------------------- x ----------------------- = 0.355 moles KOH
56.014 grams
(Step 2)
Molarity = moles / volume <----- Molarity ratio
0.550 M = 0.355 moles / volume <----- Insert values
(0.550 M) x volume = 0.355 moles <----- Multiply both sides by volume
volume = 0.645 L <----- Divide both sides by 0.550
Answer: This is hard to do accurately, but here is my best assessment.
Explanation:
Experiment: B - describes how the experiment was done
Conclusion: A - The data support the prevailing hypothesis
Research: D - This is what we analyzed
Analysis: C - We compared the data
Answer:
Qp > Kp, por lo tanto, la presión parcial de BrF₃(g) aumenta hasta alcanzar el equilibrio.
Explanation:
Paso 1: Escribir la ecuación balanceada
BrF₃ (g) ⇌ BrF(g) + F₂(g) Kp(T) = 64,0
Paso 2: Calcular el cociente de reacción (Qp)
Qp = pBrF × pF₂ / pBrF₃
Qp = 1,50 × 2,00 / 0,0150 = 200
Paso 3: Sacar una conclusión
Dado que Qp > Kp, la reacción se desplazará hacia la izquierda para alcanzar el equilibrio, es decir, la presión parcial de BrF₃(g) aumenta hasta alcanzar el equilibrio.
Animalia and Plantae
Hope that helps
Answer:
The final and initial concentration of the acid and it's conjugate base are approximately equal, that is we use the weak acid approximation.
Explanation:
The Henderson-Hasselbalch is used to calculate the pH of a buffer solution. It depends on the weak acid approximation.
Since the weak acid ionizes only to a small extent, then we can say that [HA] ≈ [HA]i
Where [HA] = final concentration of the acid and [HA]i = initial concentration of the acid.
It also follows that [A^-] ≈ [A^-]i where [A^-] and[A^-]i refer to final and initial concentrations of the conjugate base hence the answer above.
