Answer:Introspection
Explanation:Introspection refers to looking within yourself and examining your own thoughts and emotions.
In experiment this technique is used to let participants analyze their own thoughts and feelings in a more structured way so that they can give their personal take on the situation or experiment.
Based on the number of guidelines for <em>communicating with children about divorce</em> by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David, the one which is NOT a part of the guidelines is to:
- Explain that things will be better soon
According to the given question, we are asked to state the statement which is NOT a part of the guidelines by<em> Ellen and Judy David</em> about telling children about divorce.
As a result of this, we can see that based on the guidelines which were given by Ellen Galinsky and Judy David about <em>communicating with children about divorce</em>, it is important to let them know what is going on, but <em>not to explain that things will be better soon</em>, as this was NOT one of the guidelines.
Read more about divorce here:
brainly.com/question/7138705
Answer:
The sun plays an important role in Japanese mythology and religion as the Emperor is said to be the direct descendant of the sun goddess Amaterasu and the legitimacy of the ruling house rested on this divine appointment and descent from the chief deity of the predominant Shinto religion.
Explanation:
1. make this your own
2. love ya
Answer: 4. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Explanation:
In June 1978, the Supreme Court declared that affirmative action was legal insofar as racial quotas were not used. The case was brought by a white California man, Allan Bakke who said he had suffered reverse racism as he had higher scores than minority group members but was refused admission because of a University rule that reserved 16% of admission slots for minority groups. The Supreme Court ordered the University to admit Bakkie as using quotas was unconstitutional but also held that race can be used as a valid factor in admissions decisions.
This showed that affirmative action was legal but subject to scrutiny.
I’m pretty sure the answer is c
