Answer:
Thats FALSE.
The concept CORRELATION not automatically means CAUSATION.
Step-by-step explanation:
Previous concepts
The correlation coefficient is a "statistical measure that calculates the strength of the relationship between the relative movements of two variables". It's denoted by r and its always between -1 and 1.
And in order to calculate the correlation coefficient we can use this formula:
Solution to the problem
Some useful concepts are:
Correlation is a statistical measure described with a number that describes the size and direction of a relationship between two or more variables. The correlation between variables, NOT mean that the change in one variable is the cause of the change in the values of the other variable.
Causation is a term refered to one event as the result of the occurrence of the other event for example, there is a causal relationship between event A and B like a cause and effect. One important thing to mention here is that the causation is not an easy concept to measure.
"The difference between the two types of relationships are easy to identify since one can be measured with a numerical value and the other no (Here is one example: smoking causes an increase in the risk of developing lung cancer), or it can correlate with another ( smoking is correlated with alcoholism, but it does not cause alcoholism)".
So is clear that the concept CORRELATION not automatically means CAUSATION.
The ratio of the number of sundaes with nuts to the number of sundaes without nuts is; 11:39
<h3>How to find the sharing ratio?</h3>
We are given;
Number of sundaes with nuts sold = 11
Number of sundaes without nuts sold = 39
Thus, the ratio of the number of sundaes with nuts to the number of sundaes without nuts is;
11:39
Read more about Sharing ratio at; brainly.com/question/16981404
#SPJ1
A) 45 mins
each big square represents 15 mins
b) 100km/h
speed= distance/time so it would be 50km/0.5h= 100km/h
Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
∠5 = 95°
Step-by-step explanation:
Where the transversal crosses parallel lines at some angle not a right angle, all of the acute angles are congruent, and all of the obtuse angles are congruent. The acute angles are (obviously) not congruent with the acute angles. Any acute angle is supplementary to any obtuse angle.
Since angles 5 and 6 are a linear pair, the angle relationships of the parallel lines are irrelevant. A linear pair of angles is supplementary.
∠6 = 85° . . . . is given
∠5 is shown as obtuse, so its measure is ...
∠5 = 180° -85° = 95°
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
85° angles: 2, 3, 6, 7
95° angles: 1, 4, 5, 8
Any angle from the 85° angle list is <em>not congruent</em> with any angle from the 95° angle list. For example, angles 2 and 5 are not congruent.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
We know that the break even point is the point where the cost and the revenue equations intersect. So the break even point in this situation is:
C= R
<=> 20/3x+50 = 10x (with x > 0 and x is a whole number)
<=>
-50x -20 = 0
<=> x ≈ 5
If the company sells more than 5 items, it will have benefit
If the company sells less than 5 items, it will lose