Answer:
Density, melting point. and magnetic properties
Explanation:
I can think of three ways.
1. Density
The density of Cu₂S is 5.6 g/cm³; that of CuS is 4.76 g/cm³.
It should be possible to distinguish these even with high school equipment.
2. Melting point
Cu₂S melts at 1130 °C (yellowish-red); CuS decomposes at 500 °C (faint red).
A Bunsen burner can easily reach these temperatures.
3. Magnetic properties
You can use a Gouy balance to measure the magnetic susceptibilities.
In Cu₂S the Cu⁺ ion has a d¹⁰ electron configuration, so all the electrons are paired and the solid is diamagnetic.
In CuS the Cu²⁺ ion has a d⁹ electron configuration, so all there is an unpaired electron and the solid is paramagnetic.
A sample of Cu₂S will be repelled by the magnetic field and show a decrease in weight.
A sample of CuS will be attracted by the magnetic field and show an increase in weight.
In the picture below, you can see the sample partially suspended between the poles of an electromagnet.
The molar mass of the gas is 77.20 gm/mole.
Explanation:
The data given is:
P = 3.29 atm, V= 4.60 L T= 375 K mass of the gas = 37.96 grams
Using the ideal Gas Law will give the number of moles of the gas. The formula is
PV= nRT (where R = Universal Gas Constant 0.08206 L.atm/ K mole
Also number of moles is not given so applying the formula
n= mass ÷ molar mass of one mole of the gas.
n = m ÷ x ( x molar mass) ( m mass given)
Now putting the values in Ideal Gas Law equation
PV = m ÷ x RT
3.29 × 4.60 = 37.96/x × 0.08206 × 375
15.134 = 1168.1241 ÷ x
15.134x = 1168.1241
x = 1168.1241 ÷ 15.13
x = 77.20 gm/mol
If all the units in the formula are put will get cancel only grams/mole will be there. Molecular weight is given by gm/mole.
Answer:
moles = 36/180 = 0.2 moles
molarity = 0.2/2 = 0.1 mol/dm3
The normality that would be calculated will be to high because the change in volume will be greater than the actual change in volume. if the buret tip is not filled when reading the initial volume, the actual volume should be lesser with that reading. so if you will you the higher reading the change in volume or the volume you use in titration will be higher than the actual