Let's do this using the process of elimination. Since you didn't include choice D, we can only use A, B, and C.
C: If we're finding the width of the patio, how is the thickness of the tiles going to help? C is wrong.
A: We already know the area (72), so how does knowing the perimeter help us? All we know using that information is that 2 pairs of numbers give us the perimeter & also multiply to get 72. But not <em>which</em> 2. A is wrong.
B: Pay more attention to the last part of B... "the length". Well, if we have the area (72), and we have the length, then we can do area/length-width to find the width. B is correct!
<em><u /><u />
</em><em><u /><u>Don't forget to rate this answer the </u><u>Brainliest</u><u>!</u></em>
Answer:
A. ...equal to 30%
Step-by-step explanation:
A null hypothesis will try to say that there is no statistical significance between two variables and the researcher will try to disapprove it.
In this case, Dr, Huber will try to disapprove that 30% of all tea-drinkers prefer green tea to black tea.
H₀:p=30% where p is the proportion of all tea-drinkers prefer green tea to black tea.
3 cars earns him $600.
(0.03)*$32,343 = $907.29 commission
total earnings = $907.29 + $600
= $1,507.29
9 + -6 -6 : perform multiplication
Simplify - -3