James Madison address the issue of class in the composition of the House of Representatives in Federalist Paper #57

Social Studies

1 answer:

maks197457 [2]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

In Federalist Paper #57, James Madison presents arguments related to the concern that the House of representative would become only representative of the upper classes, to the dismay of the lower class.

Explanation:

Madison does not deny that representatives might probably be disproportionately from the upper class. However, he argues that these upper class representatives, will still be concerned with the issues that matter to the lower classes, simply because the majority of their electors come from the lower classes.

Because they need to be re-elected frequently, Madison says, representatives have to connect with their constituents, and represent their interests, otherwise, they risk removal from office.

You might be interested in

What main idea would be described by these headlines?

Yuliya22 [10]

I think your answer is D.) Labor Unions although if this is incorrect please let me know so I can research more on the subject.

3 0

4 years ago

Globalization affects even small communities around the world and sparks a number of different responses from local residents. I

matrenka [14]

Answer:

Describes Local community Responses.

Negotiating better terms of engagement.

Embracing new opportunities.

Fighting detrimental change.

Does not describe local community responses

ignoring the effects of globalization.

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Who created farming?

maxonik [38]

There is no exact or precise answer to this but farming was probably created in the middle east/far east of the world because rice and wheat was the primary crop. However, farming was also invented independently across other parts of the world as well.

Hope my answer helped :)

4 0

3 years ago

If dave does mark a favor, then mark is more likely to later agree to help dave out. this reflects

RUDIKE [14]

Respect, honesty, trustworthiness..ect.......

3 0

3 years ago

Does abiding by the Second Amendment mean gun restrictions are illegal, or should the government limit civilian ownership of mod

BabaBlast [244]

I believe the lather that there should be gun restriction because modern weapons have become 100 times more accessible today than in the past. It is fundamental to understand that guns are not the problem itself but the power lies in the individual who can use that gun for dangerous, threatening reasons. So Yes gun restriction is necessary because every person isn't capable of using a gun properly.

please vote my answer brainliest. thanks!

8 0

3 years ago