Answer:
a) = 0.704%
b) = 1.30%
c) = 2.60%
Explanation:
Given that:
= 
For Part A; where Concentration of A = 0.270 M
Percentage Ionization(∝) 



percentage% (∝) = 
= 0.704%
For Part B; where Concentration of B =
M



percentage% (∝) = 0.0130 × 100%
= 1.30%
For Part C; where Concentration of C= 



percentage% (∝) = 0.02608 × 100%
= 2.60%
Answer:
Potassium cation = K⁺²
Explanation:
The metal cation in K₂SO₄ is K⁺². While the anion is SO₄²⁻.
All the metals have tendency to lose the electrons and form cation. In given compound the metal is potassium so it should form the cation. The overall compound is neutral.
The charge on sulfate is -2. While the oxidation state of potassium is +1. So in order to make compound overall neutral there should be two potassium cation so that potassium becomes +2 and cancel the -2 charge on sulfate and make the charge on compound zero.
2K⁺² , SO₄²⁻
K₂SO₄
Answer:
Explanation:
The formula for sodium is Na. It does not form a molecule in some way.
1 mol Na = 6.02*10^23 atoms
3.91 mol = x Cross multiply
x = 3.91 * 6.02 * 10^23
x = 23.65 * 10^23
x = 2.365 * 10^24
Scientific notation is always expressed as a number 1 ≤ x < 10
Answer:
317.6 mL
Explanation:
Step 1: Write the balanced neutralization equation
MgO + 2 HCl ⇒ MgCl₂ + H₂O
Step 2: Calculate the mass corresponding to 640.0 mg of MgO
The molar mass of MgO is 40.30 g/mol. The moles corresponding to 640.0 mg (0.6400 g) of MgO are:
0.6400 g × (1 mol/40.30 g) = 0.01588 mol
Step 3: Calculate the moles of HCl that react with 0.01588 moles of MgO
The molar ratio of MgO to HCl is 1:2. The moles of HCl are 2/1 × 0.01588 mol = 0.03176 mol
Step 4: Calculate the volume of 0.1000 M HCl that contains 0.03176 moles
0.03176 mol × (1 L/0.1000 mol) = 0.3176 L = 317.6 mL
Answer:
Here's what I get.
Explanation:
The MO diagrams of KrBr, XeCl, and XeBr are shown below.
They are similar, except for the numbering of the valence shell orbitals.
Also, I have drawn the s and p orbitals at the same energy levels for both atoms in the compounds. That is obviously not the case.
However, the MO diagrams are approximately correct.
The ground state electron configuration of KrF is

KrF⁺ will have one less electron than KrF.
You remove the antibonding electron from the highest energy orbital, so the bond order increases.
The KrF bond will be stronger.