Answer: Stratified random sampling
Explanation:
Given : The manager of the customer service division of a major consumer electric company is interested in determining whether the customers who have purchased a Blu-ray player made by the company over the past 12 months are satisfied with their products. If there are 4 different brands of Blu-ray players made by the company.
The best sampling strategy which we can use is stratified random sampling because it is not much costly and also it induces the efficiency . We can me different strata according to the 4 brands , then we can randomly select participants for the sample.
- Stratified random sampling is a method of probability sampling in which a researcher divides the entire population into multiple homogeneous groups known as strata and then he randomly select an sample members from each strata for research .
Unsecured bonds, these bonds are also called debenture bonds.
I hope this helps.
Answer: 0.755
Explanation:
From the information given, the current per share value of the option if it expires in one year will be calculated as follows:
Firstly, we calculate the present value which will be:
= $28 / ( 1 + 0.05 )
= $28/1.05
= $26.667
The number of options needed will be:
= ( 34 - 28 )/ ( 4-0)
= 6/4
= 1.5
Therefore,
27.80 = (1.5 x Co) + [28 / (1+0.05)]
27.80 = 1.5Co + (28/1.05)
27.80 = 1.5Co + 26.667
1.5Co = 28.0 - 26.667
1.5Co = 1.1333
Co = 0.755
Therefore, the answer is 0.755
Answer:
6.53%
Explanation:
For computing the after cost of debt we need to use the RATE formula i.e to be shown in attached spreadsheet. Kindly find it below:
Given that,
Present value = $1,050.76
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 10% = $100
NPER = 5 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after applying this above formula
1. The pretax cost of debt is 8.70
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 8.70% × ( 1 - 0.25)
= 6.53%
Answer:
procedural unconscionability
Explanation:
Since Nate is finding the language of the contract difficult to understand. This is most likely a case of procedural unconscionability.
In contract law, procedural unconscionability refers to a situation where the unconscionability results from <u>inequalities between the parties in respect of age, intelligence,</u> and relative bargaining power.
Furthermore, procedural unconscionability projects an indication that both parties did not freely consent to all terms proposed.
