Remainder part of the question:
This turned out to be a very poor growth strategy because
A. the capital stock was increasing less rapidly than technology.
B. the amount of labor per unit of capital was increasing.
C. there were diminishing returns to capital.
D. the amount of capital per hour worked was decreasing
Answer:
Option C There were diminishing returns to capital.
Explanation:
The reason is that the investment gave diminishing returns which didn't covered its cost of capital (the cost that we pay to finance providers). This diminishing returns limited the investment in the forthcoming period and as result we see the fall of Soviet Union. So this option provides a better insight to the poor growth strategy. The investment must be in projects that generates greater value to the organization.
Answer:
$26,800
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Probability of the risk = 40%
Cost of the project = $67,000
So by considering the above information
The expected monetary value of the risk event is
= Probability of the risk × cost of the project
= 40% × $67,000
= $26,800
By multiplying the probability with the cost of the project, the expected monetary value could come
Credit the "bond payable" liability account for the total face value of the bonds and debit cash for the same amount.
I’m pretty sure it’s d sorry if it’s wrong!
Answer:
The answer is C.
Explanation:
In a competitive market, all firms produce identical goods and services. No firm or seller can influence the prevailing market price. To increase their revenue, firms must increase their outputs.
In this industry, firms make economic profit(revenue minus accounting cost minus implicit cost) in the short run but this economic profit reduces to zero in the long run because more firms that are attracted by the short run profit can enter the industry freely. Firms can also exit with little or no cost.