Answer:
In economics a demand is defined as the quantity of goods and services that customers are capable to buy and that they find desirable to buy at a particular price for that period of time .
Demand is dependent on the customer's needs and wants each customer may have different things that they consider to be needs to them and those they consider as just wants.
This also depends on affordability, if one doesn't have the money to buy the product then the demand isn't effective.
When the price of the product rises usually it's demand decreases and vice versa when the price fall the quantity of that product demanded will increase.
Answer:
c. The maturity risk premium is zero.
Explanation:
Pure expectation theory states that the forward rate will represent expected future rate. Term structure is said to be a reflection of what the market expects future short term rates to be.
As future rates are expected to be the same as spot rates for that date, the theory is only applicable when there is no risk premium. That is the maturity risk premium is zero.
Answer:
Option E (a and d), is the right answer.
Explanation:
Option E is the correct answer because increasing aggregate demand results in increasing income, output, and employment. In an economy, when the aggregate demand increases, the price level also goes up. Due to the rise in aggregate demand the aggregate demand curve shifts rightwards. Consequently, it shows that there will be an increase in the gross domestic product in the short run. That is why option E is correct.
Answer:
its D. a canal
Explanation:
i got it right on my test on Edge
Answer:
In the understanding of this court case, where the plaintiff (L.M.) filed a lawsuit against Pacheco on sexual abuse, the court ruled that the perpetration of the abhorrent act committed did not have to do with Pacheco´s ´´scope of employment´´ as the act happened outside the boundaries of the church and not within his working hours. However, if the plaintiff were to argue that in fact this conduct happened within the scope of employment, she would have to explain and convince that Pacheco was indeed responsible as it is a Pastor's duty and responsibility to guide and counsel at all hours, and not just limited to his church´s hours. A pastor is a figure of responsibility as a visible head for a community, not to mention that in some churches, a pastor is also a legal representative.
Employers should be held liable for the acts of their employees whenever there is a failure to supervise employees or some kind of misdemeanor is perpetrated within the employer´s work facilities or influential premises. These points of view however, are not stated by a lawyer/judicially, these are my personal observations after having researched on the case.
