Matter is a slightly archaic word for something with mass, as in the conservation of matter (which must be paired with the conservation of energy to still hold true. Mass can be converted back and forth between energy, so therefore so can matter. Of course relativistic mass is conserved as it's a function of the energy of an object in that reference frame.
No, because the matter<span> of which it is made remains the </span>same<span>, But weight is not a good measure of how much </span>matter<span> he has.scientist needed to describe the amount of </span>matter, independent of weight. That word is mass<span>.</span>
Answer: i might be wrong but i feel like it’s A. wind blowing at 3km/h just because “ energy of an object is the energy that it possesses due to its motion.”
