it is governed by public law
Answer:
The correct solution will be "Consultation
".
Explanation:
- Thought and consideration amongst doctors on something like a condition or its diagnosis their doctor recognized in such a heart consultant for evaluation, evaluation, or conferral to meet alongside his doctor during routine consultation as well as review.
- Or put it another way, a consultation seems to be simply a meeting session. If you'd like to take assistance from such a specialist or experienced or any other kind of, a consultation has been the session you are scheduling with each other.
Answer:
b. social learning theory
Explanation:
In sociology, the social learning theory states that learning is the result of the interaction of different forces or components:
- Learning can be first acquired by observing others (in other words through models or observational learning).
- Learning can also be acquired through rewards and punishments (also known in psychology as conditioning)
- Learning, also is acquired by the feedback that we get from other people (this point is related to the previous one and is known as social reinforcement).
Therefore, Conditioning, social reinforcement, and observational learning are components of b. social learning theory.
Answer:
Briefing-
Explanation:
Briefing-
when responsibilities is transfer from one incident commander to new incoming incident commander, the termed used for briefing is called transfer of command briefing.
Few reason behind transfer of command
1) when official considered to be necessary to take command
2) for more effectiveness of work
3) due to personal emergencies
Answer:
Religion declines with economic development. In a previous post that rattled around the Internet, I presented a scholarly explanation for this pattern: people who feel secure in this world have less interest in another one.
The basic idea is that wealth allows people to feel more secure in the sense that they are confident of having their basic needs met and expect to lead a long healthy life. In such environments, there is less of a market for religion, the primary function of which is to help people cope with stress and uncertainty.
Some readers of the previous post pointed out that the U.S. is something of an anomaly because this is a wealthy country in which religion prospers. Perhaps taking the view that one swallow makes a summer, the commentators concluded that the survival of religion here invalidates the security hypothesis. I do not agree.
Explanation:
The first point to make is that the connection between affluence and the decline of religious belief is as well-established as any such finding in the social sciences. In research of this kind, the preferred analysis strategy is some sort of line-fitting exercise. No researcher ever expects every case to fit exactly on the line, and if they did, something would be seriously wrong.
