Answer:
It forms a scalene triangle
Step-by-step explanation:
This is because scalene triangle does not have any of its sides equal.
is also 10.54.And looking at the measurements none of it are equal to each other so therefore it is a scalene triangle
Hmm if I'm not mistaken, is just an "ordinary" annuity, thus
![\bf \qquad \qquad \textit{Future Value of an ordinary annuity} \\\\ A=pymnt\left[ \cfrac{\left( 1+\frac{r}{n} \right)^{nt}-1}{\frac{r}{n}} \right] \\\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cqquad%20%5Cqquad%20%5Ctextit%7BFuture%20Value%20of%20an%20ordinary%20annuity%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0AA%3Dpymnt%5Cleft%5B%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cleft%28%201%2B%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7Bn%7D%20%5Cright%29%5E%7Bnt%7D-1%7D%7B%5Cfrac%7Br%7D%7Bn%7D%7D%20%5Cright%5D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C)
The -1 affects the coefficient of the entire term.
Without the -1,
the term has a positive coefficient.
(3a)² = 9a²
However, with the -1,
the term has a negative coefficient.
-(3a)² = -9a²
Answer:
The answer is "0.142466".
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the p formula for the proportion of nonconforming units through the subgrouping which can vary in sizes:


Defects 

It calculates the controls limits through the p-chart that is:

So, the upper control limits:

Answer:
5.8m
Step-by-step explanation: