Answer: c. Tenancy in common
Explanation: When two or more parties concurrently or simultaneously posses distinct and undivided ownership of a property such that each distinct party has the right to bargain or transact his or her own interest in the property without needing to inform or seek consent of the other parties. Tenancy in common does not subject the owners to having equal share of the property, any of the parties may wish to transfer or attach a creditor to his or her interest. Also, in tenancy in common, upon the death of any party or interest holder, the heir of the tenant becomes the owner of the tenant's interest.
When contrasting life-course persistent offenders with adolescent-limited offenders, researchers agree that: the causes and consequences of the two are very different.
One of the strongest correlates of crime is age, with a common empirical finding of an adolescent rise and peak of offending. One theory in particular, Moffitt’s developmental taxonomy, advances a specific hypothesis for the age–crime relationship, with a focus on a specific typology of offenders, adolescence-limited who offend for specific reasons during adolescence. This chapter reviews the adolescence-limited hypothesis relevant empirical research, and concludes with summary statements, challenges to Moffitt’s adolescence-limited hypothesis, and directions for future research.
There are other theories that have been developed to explain the rise and peak of adolescent offending. Patterson (1997) set out a learning model in which decreases in parents monitoring and supervision during adolescence lead adolescents to offend. Another explanation is Agnew’s (2003) integrated theory of the adolescent peak in offending. Recalling that adolescents are given only some adult privileges and responsibilities, Agnew believes that this has important effects on increasing delinquency among adolescents, including a decline in supervision increased social and academic demands participation in a larger, more diverse peer-oriented social world an increase in the desire for adult privileges, and reduced ability to cope in a legitimate manner and an increase in the disposition to cope in an illegitimate (delinquency/crime) manner to attain the adult privileges and goods they want
Learn more about contrasting life-course persistent offenders
brainly.com/question/6258097
#SPJ4
Answer: Students have the right to refuse to participate in this study.
Explanation: From this scenario, the most appropriate statement is that students have the right to refuse to participate in the study. This is because the research project is a personal project by the instructor, which is not a prerequisite for passing the course introductory Psychology. Simply because the instructor made it a part of the course, the students have the right to refuse participation.
The United States would not interfere in the internal affairs of or the wars between European powers; (2) the United States recognized and would not interfere with existing colonies and dependencies in the Western Hemisphere; (3) the Western Hemisphere was closed to future colonization; and (4) any attempt by a European power to oppress or control any nation in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
The boundaries around the Mississippi river on the west side, Canada on the north, and Spanish Florida on the south
