I got 2.5 miles as my answer do you want to know how I got it...
Equilateral triangles have three equal angles, so we right away know that x=60º. Then, we just solve (3(60)-70)º, which is 110º, for the answer.
Answer:
X is 24.
Step-by-step explanation:
Divide the surface area by 4
Answer:
b = 90
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum the interior angles of the pentagon and equate to 540
Starting from the top and going clockwise
b + b + 45 + 90 + 2b - 90 + 
b = 540 ← simplify left side
b + 45 = 540 ( multiply through by 2 to clear the fraction )
11b + 90 = 1080 ( subtract 90 from both sides )
11b = 990 ( divide both sides by 11 )
b = 90
Thus
b + 45 = 90 + 45 = 135
2b - 90 = 2(90) - 90 = 180 - 90 = 90
b = × 90 = 135
The angle measure from the top clockwise are
90°, 135°, 90°, 90°, 135°
Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
