All categories

3 years ago

Which statement correctly describes the relationship between frequency and wavelength?

Physics

2 answers:

kow [346]3 years ago

5 0

second statement: As the frequency of a wave increases, the shorter the wavelength is.

Len [333]3 years ago

3 0

The relationship between the frequency and wavelength of a wave is given by the equation:

v=λf, where v is the velocity of the wave, λ is the wavelength and f is the frequency.

If we divide the equation by f we get:

λ=v/f

From here we see that the wavelength and frequency are inversely proportional. So as the frequency increases the wavelength decreases.

So the second statement is true: As the frequency of a wave increases, the shorter the wavelength is.

You might be interested in

Symptoms of excessive stress include all of the following EXCEPT:

sweet-ann [11.9K]

Answer:

Symptoms of excessive stress include all of the following EXCEPT: increased energy level.

6 0

3 years ago

Page 40-44 earth science regents<br> just post the picture of the pages please

Anna007 [38]

I don’t know what book you’re talking about so I can’t help but have a look online, you may be able to find it if you search up the book name and look around a few websites

8 0

3 years ago

If it takes 50.0 seconds to lift 10.0 Newtons of books to a height of 7.0

Ilya [14]

Work of the force = 10 N

Time required for the work = 50 sec

Height = 7 m

We are given with the value of work and time in the question.

Substitute the values in the formula of power and then you'll get the power required.

We know that,

w = Work

p = Power

t = Time

By the formula,

Given that,
Work (w) = 7 m = 70 Joules
Time (t) = 50 sec
Substituting their values,

p = 70/50

p = 1.4 watts

Therefore, the power required is 1.4 watts.

Hope it helps!

3 0

3 years ago

The dot or scalar product of two (3d) vec- tors ⃗a = ⟨a1,a2,a3⟩ and ⃗b = ⟨b1,b2,b3⟩ is defined as

Neko [114]

Yes, yes, we know all of that. It certainly took you long enough to
get around to asking your question.

If
   a = (14, 10.5, 0)
and
   b = (4.62, 9.45, 0) ,

then, to begin with, neither vector has a z-component, and they
both lie in the x-y plane.

Their dot-product a · b = (14 x 4.62) + (10.5 x 9.45) =

         (64.68)   +   (99.225) = 163.905 (scalar)

I feel I earned your generous 5 points just reading your treatise and
finding your question (in the last line). I shall cherish every one of them.

7 0

4 years ago

A car is stopped at a traffic light. When the light turns green at t=0, a truck with a constant speed passes the car with a 20m/

s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

At $t = (70 / 3) \; {\rm s}$ (approximately $23.3 \; {\rm s}$ .)

Explanation:

Note that the acceleration of the car between $t = 0\; {\rm s}$ and $t = 20\; {\rm s}$ ( $\Delta t = 20\; {\rm s}$ ) is constant. Initial velocity of the car was $v_{0} = 0\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}$ , whereas $v_{1} = 35\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}$ at $t = 20\; {\rm s}\!$ . Hence, at $t = 20\; {\rm s}\!\!$ , this car would have travelled a distance of:

$\begin{aligned}x &= \frac{(v_{1} - v_{0})\, \Delta t}{2} \\ &= \frac{(35\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} - 0\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) \times (20\; {\rm s})}{2} \\ &= 350\; {\rm m}\end{aligned}$ .

At $t = 20\; {\rm s}$ , the truck would have travelled a distance of $x = v\, t = 20\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} \times 20\; {\rm s} = 400\; {\rm m}$ .

In other words, at $t = 20\; {\rm s}$ , the truck was $400\; {\rm m} - 350\; {\rm m} = 50\; {\rm m}$ ahead of the car. The velocity of the car is greater than that of the truck by $35\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} - 20\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}} = 15 \; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}$ . It would take another $(50\; {\rm m}) / (15\; {\rm m\cdot s^{-1}}) = (10/3)\; {\rm s}$ before the car catches up with the truck.

Hence, the car would catch up with the truck at $t = (20 + (10/3))\; {\rm s} = (70 / 3)\; {\rm s}$ .

3 0

2 years ago