Answer:
1. $46,550
2. $405,000
3. $450,600
Explanation:
1. Computation of differential cost regarding the decision to buy the model 200
Differential cost = Cost of a new model 300 - Cost of a new model 200
Differential cost = $396,350 - $349,800
Differential cost = $46,550
So, the differential cost regarding decision to buy model 200 is $46,550.
2. Sunk costs are the costs which are already incurred by the entity in the past and which are not relevant to decision made today. In this case, sunk cost is the cost of the machine purchased seven years ago for $405,000.
3. Opportunity cost is the profit forgone by chosen alternative course of action. In this case, the Opportunity cost regarding the decision to invest in the model 200 machine is $450,600.
Answer:
The options are given below:
A. 4.3
B. 20
C. 23
D. 46
The answer is C. 23
Explanation:
In order to calculate this, we would need the following:
- Total number of people watching television in Houston households.
- Total number of people watch the show American Family in Houston households.
From the question above, we have:
- Number of households with televisions = 3,300,000
- Number of households watching the show= 759,000.
To calculate the rating, we have:
(759,000/3,300,000) X 100
0.23 X 100
= 23
Answer:
The given statement is "False".
Explanation:
- Supply-side policies include those strategies that increase the economic ability of an enterprise as well as the ability to manufacture. To increase supply-side efficiency, there are also many specific steps that somehow an authority may undertake.
- Any strategy that increases the economic capacity of a nation's infrastructure and therefore its ability to transfer should be under the supply-side legal framework.
There are different kinds of trade. Trading in foreign currency options would most likely be an appropriate hedging tool for individual investors who want to hedge the risk on specific U.S. exchange-listed stocks.
<h3>Currency option hedges</h3>
- Currency option hedges are known to be tools that are used in international business.
An example, when an American importer is said to agree to buy some food equipment from a Chinese manufacturer at a later future date. The transaction will be carried out in Chinese currency.
The American importer has therefore made an hedge by buing currency options on the Chinese currency.
Learn more about trade from
brainly.com/question/4957225
Answer: No, it is not a violation of RESPA
Explanation:
No, the scenario in this question is not a violation of the RESPA conduct because there is no penalization if an organization pays an individual for the services performed. The RESPA violations of bribery, referrals, and the fee splitting proscription are therefore subject to the severe penalties which further includes fines and imprisonment.
