Answer:
<h2>In the context of Consumer Theory or Indifference Curve involving two goods,the opportunity of any one good is computed by how much of the other good is foregone or sacrificed to purchase one more unit of that particular good.</h2>
Explanation:
- In this instance,when Bill's diner consumes 35 burgers and 25 hotdogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
.Therefore,initially Bill diner's opportunity cost of an additional hot dog is 1.4 units of burger.
- Now,when Bill's diner chooses to consume a combination of 25 burgers and 65 hot dogs,its opportunity cost of additional hot dogs=
approximately.Hence,Bill's diner is willing to sacrifice approximately 0.385 units of burger to consume an additional unit of hot dog. - Now,due to the change in consumption combination,the change in opportunity cost of additional hot dog=
units of burger.Notice,that here the opportunity cost of additional hot dog decreased from 1.4 units of burger to 0.385 units of burger as Bill's diner changed the consumption combination of both burgers and hot dogs.
Answer:
Liabilities
Explanation:
Liabilities are the debts and obligations that a business owes.
Answer:
$2960 yearly savings
Explanation:
From the values given and from mathematical manipulation, he or she needs a contribution of at least $2900 every year in order to achieve his goal of $50,000.
EXPLANATION
- If the child is 5yr old now, in 13years time, she will be 18yr old.
- for the next 13years, it would have amount to $38350
- remember the bank will give an annual interest rate of 2%
- so for 13years, that's 26% = 0.26
- In the 13th year, he would have saved $38350, add the 26% interest for the duration of 13years = 26% x $38350 + $38350 = $48321
- His savings will fall between $2950 - $2960 yearly.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Because the injunction is the legal remedy that the special court's judge orders not the jury. The order enforce a party to do what must be done or refrains it from doing specific acts that harms the other party. So saying that Doorway sought the court injunction in which the jury decides the right course of action is incorrect because injunction is the warning of judge not of jury.
They dont see the end benefit
Not 100% on this one
