Answer:
C) An Ethical Dilemma
Explanation:
An ethical dilemma is also called either a moral dilemma or an ethical paradox and results when problem arise in the process of making decisions about two possible moral options or imperatives where none of the two options are absolutely or unambiguously preferable or acceptable as a result of negative ethical outcomes.
The challenge with moral or ethical codes is that while we are faced with varous ethical challenges in our daily activities, most are usually straightforward right or wrong, acceptable or unacceptable. But ethical dilemma is difficult because it is just difficult between the right or wrong choice or decision in such a case.
An example is being asked to choose between two loved ones in a dire or life and death situation, where the chosen is saved and the abandoned is lost. This is an ethical dilemma.
Answer:
Product Quantity Selling price Sales value
Pint $ $
Smooth skin 140,000 3.60 504,000
Silken skin 180,000 5.30 954,000
320,000 1,458,000
The amount of joint cost to be apportioned to smooth skin
= $504,000/$1,458,000 x $340,000
= $117,531
Explanation:
There is need to determine the sales value for each product by multiplying the quantity of pint sold by respective selling prices. Then, we will compute the total sales value. The amount of joint cost that will be allocated to sooth skin is the ratio of sales of smooth skin to the total sales value multiplied by the joint costs incurred.
Regal Financial institution is a Savings and loan bank. Conventionally,S$L must have a Mortgage dominant of over 65%.
S&L are typically suitable for home loans than commercial banks because they have lower borrowing rates. their emergence was neccessitated by the exclusivity of commercial banks.
Answer: Weighted Average Cost of Capital
Explanation:
The Weighted Average Cost of capital for a company refers to rate a company pays on the various capital methods it employs to fund its operations such as common and preferred stock as well as debt.
This rate is used to evaluate the attractiveness of economic ventures and projects because the company needs the rate of return on the project to be at least higher than the company WACC so that the company may be able to pay off its capital holders.
1st generation: focused on individual growth through t-groups. management practices and employee involvement.
-action research, survey feedback, and sociotechnical systems.
2nd generation: emphasized larger, system-wide concerns such as culture, change management, and organizational development.
I believe there is a little big of both losses and gains. OD is not a one-size fits all approach. therefore different organizations require different aproaches. it is a gain in the sense that we have new experience and research programs, academics have built on the previous practices so they are new and improved. But it is a loss because maybe for a certain company a 1st generation OD practice would work best but it has been over looked or changed so much because of the 2nd generation "gains" they never try it out.
