Alright so, since it says that he eats at least $10 dollars no matter what we can basically leave that alone. next week have $3.50 for every new customer (x) so we could write this as $3.50x. and lastly we have Y the amount he will earn every week.
so the equation would be $10+$3.50x=Y.
if we had more information we might be able to solve for Y but since it doesn't tell us how many he sold we would leave it like that.
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
4 - t = 3(t - 1) - 5 ← distribute and simplify right side
4 - t = 3t - 3 - 5
4 - t = 3t - 8 ( subtract 3t from both sides )
4 - 4t = - 8 ( subtract 4 from both sides )
- 4t = - 12 ( divide both sides by - 4 )
t = 3
Complete question is;
Regarding the violation of multicollinearity, which of the following description is wrong?
a. It changes the intercept of the regression line.
b. It changes the sign of the slope.
c. It changes the slope of the regression line.
d. It changes the value of F-tests.
e. It changes the value of T-tests
Answer:
a. It changes the intercept of the regression line
Step-by-step explanation:
Multicollinearity is a term used in multiple regression analysis to show a high correlation between independent variables of a study.
Since it deals with independent variables correlation, it means it must be found before getting the regression equation.
Now, looking at the options, the one that doesn't relate with multicollinearity is option A because the intercept of the regression line is the value of y that is predicted when x is 0. Meanwhile, multicollinearity from definition above does in no way change the intercept of the regression line because it doesn't predict the y-value when x is zero.
60,000 + 3,000 + 20 + 9
= 63,000 + 29
= 63,029.
Answer: 63,029
Hope this helps have A wonderful Christmas
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Use a graphing calc or desmos to help guide you.
Step-by-step explanation:
