Answer:
67.1%
Explanation:
Based on the chemical equation, if we determine the moles of sodium carbonate, we can find the moles of NaHCO₃ that reacted and its mass, thus:
<em>Moles Na₂CO₃ - 105.99g/mol-:</em>
6.35g * (1mol / 105.99g) = 0.0599 moles of Na₂CO₃ are produced.
As 1 mole of sodium carbonate is produced when 2 moles of NaHCO₃ reacted, moles of NaHCO₃ that reacted are:
0.0599 moles of Na₂CO₃ * (2 moles NaHCO₃ / 1 mole Na₂CO₃) = 0.1198 moles of NaHCO₃
And the mass of NaHCO₃ in the sample (Molar mass: 84g/mol):
0.1198 moles of NaHCO₃ * (84g / mol) = 10.06g of NaHCO₃ were in the original sample.
And percent of NaHCO₃ in the sample is:
10.06g NaHCO₃ / 15g Sample * 100 =
<h3>67.1%</h3>
Answer:
B. PROTONS EXHIBIT STRONGER PULL ON OUTER f ORBITALS
Explanation:
Lanthanide contraction is the greater than normal decrease in the ionic radius of the lanthanide series from atomic number 57 to atomic number 71. This decrease is rather not expected of the ionic radii of these elements and they result in the greater decrease in the subsequent series of the lanthanides from the atomic number 72. The cause of which is as a result of the poor shielding effects of the nuclear charge around the electrons of the f orbitals. So therefore, protons are strongly pulled out of the 4f orbital and as a result of the poor shielding effect which causes the electrons of the 6s orbitals to be drawn more closer to the nucleus and hence resulting in a smaller atomic radii. It is worthy to note that the shielding effects of the inner electrons decreasing from s orbital to the f orbital; that is s > p > d > f. So from the decrease in the shielding effects from s to the f orbitals, lanthanide contraction results from the inability of the orbitals far away from s like the 4f orbiatls to shield the outermost shells of the lanthanide elements. So the cause of lanthanide contraction is the action of the protons which strongly pull the electrons of the f orbitals because of the poor shielding effects due to the distance of this orbital from the nucleus.
Answer:
A 1.0 g sample of propane, C3H8, was burned in the calorimeter.
The temperature rose from 28.5 0C to 32.0 0C and the heat of combustion 10.5 kJ/g.
Calculate the heat capacity of the calorimeter apparatus in kJ/0C
Explanation:
Given,
The heat of combustion = 10.5kJ/g.
Substitute these values in the above formula to get the value of heat capacity of the calorimeter.
Answer:
The heat capacity of the calorimeter is 
