11. Similar 1/2
12. Similar 2
13. no
14. no
15. No, they are not congruent because rectangles do not have equal sides, so the length of one triangle could be longer than the other and the width ozone can be shorter than the other.
16. Yes
Answer:
-3
Step-by-step explanation:
If we directly evaluate the function at -1, we get 0/0, meaning we may still have a limit to find.
In this case, factoring the polynomial at the top would be helpful.
The polynomial can be factored to (x+1)(x-2), so the function would now turn out to be (x+1)(x-2)/(x+1)
The (x+1) cancel out, leaving you with (x-2), which you can directly evaluate by plugging in x as -1:
-1-2 = -3
Quick disclaimer: the function is still undefined at -1; it's just that the function gets closer and closer to -3 as you approach -1.
I hope this helped you.
Answer:
2, 5, 9
Step-by-step explanation:
The two shorter sides added together must be longer than the third side or they cannot make a triangle.
Answer:
I assume you mean 16^(1/3) i.e. the cube root of 16
I am also assuming you mean the real cube root because, as you may know, every non-zero real number has three cube root - one real and two complex conjugates.
Since 16 = 8 x 2 and 8 = 2³ then (2³ x 2)^1/3 = (2³)^1/3 x 2^1/3 = 2 x 2^1/3
You might check that the cube root of 16 is about 2.52 which is twice the cube root of 2
Step-by-step explanation:
