Answer:
U.S. history is filled with examples of people actively challenging the power of elites, gaining rights for themselves, and protecting their interests. Are there any redeeming qualities to elitism and any downsides to pluralism? ... There is nothing redeeming about elitism.
Explanation:
Answer:
even temporary groups can pressure people to conform.
Explanation:
the three are 1st person, 2nd person, and 3rd person.
Answer:
d.acted properly in this case
Explanation:
The court acted properly in fining the company as well, the company has the obligation to examine the conducts of its employee and ensure they are ethical. Hence, for the companies failure in carrying out the oversight function, the company is implicit in the criminal conduct of Sarah.
Answer:
No theocracies are true democracies. no secular government are theocracies. Thus, some secular government are true democracies.
d. deductive invalid
Explanation:
- The given statement is deductive as well as invalid.
- Such a process of logic in which we use the logic of two or more statements to get a final logical conclusion is known as deductive logic.
- In the given situation, we have concluded that some secular governments are true democracies on the basis of no theocracies are true democracies and no secular government are theocracies.
- So although, it is deductive logic but it is invalid as well.
