<span>This shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the two parties on the idea. The null hypothesis would have shown that there is no difference in the two parties. Party affiliation, then, will likely be indicative of the level of a person's support for the concept of welfare reform.</span>
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
The type of consequences imposed to the violation of the rule will be depended on the severity of the violation.
- If the violation is not to severe, the violators would most likely only receive Publication of an admonishment by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. In this case, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants will publicly let the public know about the violators, but this does not lead to the suspension of the violators.
- If the violation is severe, Suspension and monetary penalty would most likely be imposed by AICPA and IRS.
They wanted to set such violators as an example so other members would be discouraged to conduct another violation.
Answer should be Inca Empire.
It is a true statement that when the poor lost their jobs and homes in rural area, they went to newly industrialized areas where they often lived in slums. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". The poor had to make do with any kind of work in the newly industrialized areas to make their living.
