True or False: The Eastern Roman Empire lasted for 1,000 years longer than the Western Roman Empire.

Social Studies

1 answer:

Nastasia [14]3 years ago

8 0

Answer: The Eastern Roman Empire lasted for 1,000 years longer than the Western Roman Empire:

TRUE!

Explanation: The eastern Roman empire known as the Byzantine Empire lasted 1,000 years more than the western Roman Empire because, In 330, Constantine I (Constantine the 1st) decided to make Constantinople the new seat of the Roman Empire; it could be said that this was the real starting date of the Byzantine Empire. While the Western Roman Empire crumbled and fell by 476, the Byzantine one flourished and lasted until 1453 when Constantinople was finally taken by the Ottomans.

You might be interested in

PLS ANSWER FAST how can South Africa most effectively invest in human capital WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST

irina [24]

It would be B by exporting more tobacco crops

5 0

2 years ago

Early civilizations often chose their population centers for geographic reasons. Which geographic region would best suit early f

emmasim [6.3K]

Answer:

Coastal Plains.

Explanation:

Coastal Plain's life-giving soil is good for farming.

Peanuts, tobacco, and soybeans grow well there.

8 0

3 years ago

The __________ of a study establishes the boundary between finding significant support and lacking enough support for a research

Nuetrik [128]

I think the most reasonable answer would be the second option, B. “Critical value”

4 0

3 years ago

Who created the Himalayas and the Tibetan plateau

Andrei [34K]

Answer:

The Himalayan mountain range and Tibetan plateau have formed as a result of the collision between the Indian Plate and Eurasian Plate which began 50 million years ago and continues today. Explanation: hoped i helped

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In 500 words or more (no less), explain the difference between normative ethics and meta-ethics. You may use examples, but you w

Vilka [71]

Answer and explanation:

Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that reflects on what is morally right and what is wrong. It is through that reflection that principles for human behavior are established.

"Normative ethics, that part of moral philosophy, or ethics, concerned with criteria of what is morally right and wrong". (Quoted from Britannica, link is the following: https://www.britannica.com/topic/normative-ethics)

In the other hand, metha-ethics is a branch of ethics that studies metaphysical concepts regarding morality and with special emphasis if these moral values are independent of humans.

"Metaethics is a branch of analytic philosophy that explores the status, foundations, and scope of moral values, properties, and words". (Quoted from Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, link is the following: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/)

The main difference between these two branches of philosophy/ethics is that normative ethics main focus is the morality on a certain action, whereas metaethics focus is morality itself.

6 0

3 years ago