Answer:
C.
Step-by-step explanation: im pretty sure because if you look at Ed its 5 and then if you add the same sides twice its 10 hopefully im right
Answer:
The regression line is not a good model because there is a pattern in the residual plot.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given is a residual plot for a data set
The residual plot shows scatter plot of x and y
The plotting of points show that there is not likely to be a linear trend of relation between the two variables. It is more likely to be parabolic or exponential.
Hence the regression line cannot be a good model as they do not approach 0.
Also there is not a pattern of linear trend.
D) The regression line is not a good model because there is a pattern in the residual plot.
9514 1404 393
Answer:
6. step 2; terms are improperly combined; it should be -61n-8=-8
7. no; point (2, 5) is not part of the solution in the left graph
Step-by-step explanation:
6. Step 2 should be ...
-61n -8 = -8 . . . . . because -5n-56n = -61n, not -51n
__
7. The boundary lines of both graphs go through the point (2, 5). In the left graph, the line is dashed, indicating that points on the line are not part of the solution set. The point (2, 5) on the dashed line is not a solution to that inequality.
The solid boundary line indicates that the points on the line are part of the solution set. The point (2, 5) on the solid line is a solution to that inequality.
The point (2, 5) is not a solution to both inequalities.
Answer:
so that's how you plot their intersection
