Answer:
Onaje is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
To start, total up how many shirts we have, and multiply them by <em>t</em>. Since they are the same price, we now have a total for how many shirts they bought. This proves the second and third equations that they wrote. If you take the easy way and just add them, you'll still have 25<em>t</em>, making Onaje's expression correct.
EDIT: Just saw you need why it's incorrect for Paula, just hold on.
So for Paula, it's simple why she is incorrect. If you look at the third equation she wrote, she's adding 25 to 2t, which is completely incorrect, and will come up with a different result than 16t + 9t.
Hope this helps.
You are correct with both
The correct question in the attached figure
we know that
the scale is 1 in (scale drawing)= (1/2) foot (actual)-----> 1/(1/2)=2 in/ft
[scale]=[scale drawing]/[actual]
then
[scale drawing]=[scale]*[actual]
therefore
for <span>actual width of the car 8 ft
</span>[scale drawing]=[2 in/ft]*[8 ft]=16 in
<span>
the answer is 16 in</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
2 pairs
Step-by-step explanation:
If we convert 3 3/5 into an informal fraction, it would be 18/5 (3*5+3 for the numerator) and 1 4/5 would be 9/5 (1*5+4 for the numerator). 18/5 divided by 9/5 is the same as 18/5 * 5/9 (the reciprocal of 9/5) which equals 2. Therefore she can make 2 pairs of pants.
Find the mean of the following data. (a) 9, 7, 11, 13, 2, 4, 5, 5 (b) 16, 18, 19, 21, 23, 23, 27, 29, 29, 35 (c) 2.2, 10.2, 14.7
Rufina [12.5K]
Answer:
a) 7 b) 24 c) 8.5 d) 11.4 (i think)
Step-by-step explanation: