What position does montesquieu take on the effects of lenient and severe punishments?

2 answers:

4 0

In spite of his stature as a major figure in the history of political philosophy and his strong interest in the correlation between liberty and the content of criminal law, surprisingly little has been written concerning Montesquieu's views on crime and punishment. I think that’s the answer

WITCHER [35]4 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Unlike Locke, Rousseau and Beccaria, he did not use social contract ... each and every one of Montesquieu's positions on punishment, but there are ... example, moderating the severity of punishments then in use, restricting the ... most serious crimes would have the desired effect, Montesquieu concluded, of.

Explanation:

i think it correct cuz i got it from google

You might be interested in

does anybody wanna play r.blox, that plays ragdoll alot? my username is quboxdove, if you want to add me.

r-ruslan [8.4K]

Answer:

sure I would love too

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

What year did England make slavery illegal and when was it that all slaves would be freed?

iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

1833

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Select the phrase that best describes the benefits and drawbacks of a market-based economy?.

baherus [9]

Answer:

hey. Answer B

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

HUGE POINT GIVE AWAY!

zepelin [54]

Answer: I say Halo 2 has the best multiplayer but Halo 4 is ok and thanks.

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which U.S. Supreme Court case condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommun

sergey [27]

Miranda v. Arizona is the U.S. Supreme Court case that condemned using psychological coercion, engaging in trickery or deceit, holding a suspect incommunicado, or making promises that can't be kept.

The Miranda v. Arizona Supreme Court ruling (1966) ruled that arrested persons have rights to self-discrimination and lawyers under the fifth and sixth amendments to the United States Constitution.

The Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects must be informed of their constitutional rights against defense counsel and self-incrimination before cross-examinating police.

the majority opinion by Earl Warren. Article 5 of the Constitutional Amendment requires law enforcement authorities to advise suspects on their right to remain silent during police detention interrogations and to consult lawyers.

Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona here: brainly.com/question/1307890

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago